|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
Well I'm guessing he wouldn't be asking whether he should have value bet if he got shown a Q.
Also, I'm pretty sure that at 10/20 even calling stations are aware of the concept of a continuation bet. WTF else do they tell themselves when they press the call button? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
Half potsize, could be a weird fish blocking bet with Ace high, pair bigger than 6's or even a 6 himself. I don't think folding is good against this type of a player.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
I would def. check the turn and have called a riv bet., as played, I dont like his bet strat-wise, casue you are betting that six if he had checked, and may have bluffed had you had nothing. anyway, as played I think its okay either way, I would lean towards a call and hope for 88 or something like that.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
easy fold, also i can't believe you bet the turn
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
Fold unless you think he bluff called the turn to bluff lead the river...Doesn´t seem like the type of play a callstation would make to me..
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
bet turn.
call river. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
It's a calling station so of course you have to take him to value town, nothing wrong with the turn IMO. Checking is also a valid line depending on dynamics (e.g. he peels the flop light and will try to take the pot away when you check the turn, etc.)
And these types of players do all kinds of weird illogical stuff so you really can't fold. If you knew he was the type to make "brave" river calls then you could perhaps even make a case for smallraise/fold. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
cant think ur good often enough here.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom FH vs CS
Split-pot!
|
|
|