|
View Poll Results: Who is hotter? | |||
Charlize Theron | 160 | 42.11% | |
Ana Beatriz Barros | 220 | 57.89% | |
Voters: 380. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fulltilt froze my account with 47 grand in it
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think when you get to the stage of allowing players to just follow the output of some poker AI and say it's ok so long as a human clicks the buttons, then that will be a sure fire way to kill online poker. [/ QUOTE ] i dont think dave's post is accurate. i think what he posted is the conspiracy theory the zoo agreed upon with those nl bots. but nobody knows the real truth. [/ QUOTE ] My post was more based on the realtime ICM softweare Juk linked to rather than the nlnut threads. My point being, if one can legitimately write a strategy on paper and follow it - with this being allowable - then there is no difference in automating that strategy retrieval via software. Take for example a full ring NL setminer "bot". Written on paper (or memorized): "PRE FLOP: play all pocket pairs & AK following 5/10 rule. If unopened, raise yourself. POST FLOP: If TPTK or set, bet/bet/bet else check fold" This bot will win $$$ (slowly). Given 27% rakeback, it will certainly profit. Does it really matter if the human reads from paper / memory or an on screen display? I say NO. Does it matter if the human need not be present / able to click buttons fast enough? HELL YES. that is the real danger of botting, not their play but the fact that their volume of play is limited by a human's ability to follow instructions / not tilt. |
|
|