![]() |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BS,
You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along. IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play. If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hey that JJ hand was harsh [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] timing out is soooo gay last night my uni net decided to blow out when i flopped a set , so sick. The video was pretty good, your running commentary was good too.
As for the next, i say another 4table 50nl ty ty ty ty ty ty ty |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IŽd love to see a video with many ultraaggressives/nits/passive regulars.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hay i dl my porn from there
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
IŽd love to see a video with many ultraaggressives/nits/passive regulars. [/ QUOTE ] I second this. A video with some nits or maniacs would be good to see as to how others play against them. Personally I find when you play four tables you encounter many different situations and are able to have a great discussion with it. I enjoyed the 50NL and would like to see another. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I definitely prefer the 4 table videos and would love to see a 100NL. It would be interesting to compare to the 50 and 25 videos. Otherwise, I am definitely interested in another 50NL.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
BS, You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along. IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play. If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] LearningCurve has spoken well. // M |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
BS, You videos are great as you give a running commentary of what you are thinking as you go along. IMO 4 tables is good. I sort of like the idea of 1 table of each of the suggested levels as it would be an interesting study of the way the various levels play. If you decided to go with just one level, I would prefer no higher than 50NL. 100NL would be interesting, but I don't believe the situations there would really parlay well into a micro strategy. Let's face it, the fact that so few micro are thinking makes it an entirely different beast. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] LC, I really think your game will improve more from seeing how someone handles good players than bad ones (all relative). it is much easier to dumb yourself down than dumb yourself up [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] im sure im being selfish though, as i really want to move to 100 soon and need reassurance its not that different |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BS, another thought I had was to play at a different time. Maybe during the afternoon with the nits or with the wild games on friday or saturday night.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
im sure im being selfish though, as i really want to move to 100 soon and need reassurance its not that different [/ QUOTE ]skydancing and vanbroken threw up $100NL videos that's in one of the stickies which are very good IMO. |
![]() |
|
|