#241
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
Bryan,
Please, please, please consider bringing in a steps system for the Sunday Million on a weekly basis. I suggest that it would be extremely popular. Thanks, Lloyd. |
#242
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
Very nice idea with 6 and 6a I hope the new one is implemented.
|
#243
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
Why not have 6a pay 1 seat, 3 redos, and $600 cash?
|
#244
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
I would prefer 6 & 6a over just 6. The fact that those buying in directly would NOT like 6a makes it more likely I would want to play it. I have no problem working up from Step 1, if I have a better chance to cash out something at the top even without winning the package.
|
#245
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
Hello there, MTTc... As we consider some options for the PCA Steps, we'd like your opinions, please. The current PCA Step system has been very popular; 33 PokerStars players have earned their way to the Caribbean via the current system. While the system is working well, some players (here, other forums, in email, etc.) have expressed a desire for a single table Step 6, and thus we've been considering options for the PCA Steps. Here's what we're considering: PCA Step 6: current structure, 18 players, 3 packages PCA Step 6a: 9 players, 1 package, cash to places 2 through 7 (2nd/3rd: $1,500 / 4th/5th: $1,000 / 6th/7th: $500) Thoughts? If the choice is between having both 6 & 6a, or having only 6, which would you choose? As always, thank you for your time. All the best, Bryan S. Tournaments Administrator PokerStars Poker Room Management Team [/ QUOTE ] This would be awe phreaking some. I would play 6a over 6, if this goes through. So, we will be allowed to go through the steps and then at the top can choose one of these step 6 tournies, right? |
#246
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
if only one then i prefer 6a
but dont see why u cant keep both and just remove 6 if the 18 mans dry up |
#247
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
Bryan, Please, please, please consider bringing in a steps system for the Sunday Million on a weekly basis. I suggest that it would be extremely popular. Thanks, Lloyd. [/ QUOTE ] Also, a Steps tab maybe to sort them easier |
#248
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
I would prefer 6 & 6a [/ QUOTE ] |
#249
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
The 6a is going to be much more popular especially since you can get some money out of the steps. I honestly think you should not allow cash prizes as "collusion" with some people wanting the 1500$ over the trip they have to take.
|
#250
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Steps on Stars -- feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
I would prefer 6 & 6a over just 6. The fact that those buying in directly would NOT like 6a makes it more likely I would want to play it. I have no problem working up from Step 1, if I have a better chance to cash out something at the top even without winning the package. [/ QUOTE ] I agree 100% with this. In my mind the steps were created for 1 reason mostly, to give us lower limit players a chance to play in a large buy in event. No offense to higher limit players, but it seems like a lot of players in step 6 are direct buyins taking advantage of poor play. They have a right to do so if stars allows and i don't blame them for wanting and doing it. This however defeats the original purpose of getting lower stakes players a shot to qualify for a major event. My vote is for both steps and here is what my approach as a player will be if both are offered. I will try to accumulate a few step 6 tickets(hoping i can do this). I would play the first few of them at the 1 table version so that way i at least would probably recoup some cash/entry fees back. If i failed to qualify for the package in any of the single table ones i would then take my shot at the 18 person ones with the last 2 or so. At least then i have banked some cash/recouped entry fees if i was not to qualify in the 2 table step 6. Lastly,If i was to win a step 6a i would definately play the remaining step 6 tickets in step 6a as winning a second package would be valueable but also unless i finished in 8/9th i would almost be a lock to get some cash/return for the remaining tickets. |
|
|