![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] the second part of your post seems incredibly naive. i would wager a large amount of money that there was an attempted coverup. [/ QUOTE ] then prove it, thats all I'm asking [/ QUOTE ] these threads are proof enough for me. stonewalling. denying chipdumping. denying strange tendencies in the play. DENYING WHEN SCOT TOM WORKED FOR THEM DENYING A SUPERUSER ACCOUNT EVEN EXISTED refusing to give out info on who runs the site, who owns the site, who the accts belong to. [/ QUOTE ] Claimed there was an internal investigation, then claimed that investigation revealed no wrongdoing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite the black eye, oh and all the fan boys who are apologists for online casinos...blow me. This also shows the great lengths you have to go, and even when you are lucky enough to have incredibly damning info leaked to you, they still wont admit to it. What a mess, and this industry is well overdue for 3rd party regulation and no not the paid shills they have now, a reporting transparent entity that works with the players to resolve issues as a liaison for the sites. Anyway, we get to see the depths of denial and a peek at the truth finally.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
New dramabomb plz....thread getting old
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
9/11 all over again
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
9/11 all over again [/ QUOTE ] What exactly is that supposed to mean??? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 9/11 all over again [/ QUOTE ] What exactly is that supposed to mean??? [/ QUOTE ] My guess is its a reference to the "glued to CNN" post disaster syndrome. Refresh, refresh, refresh. This stuff is riveting! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 9/11 all over again [/ QUOTE ] What exactly is that supposed to mean??? [/ QUOTE ] It was an "inside job". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
come on, coy_roy, get that stuff outta here
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 9/11 all over again [/ QUOTE ] What exactly is that supposed to mean??? [/ QUOTE ] the 9/11 crowd ran it twice. 1 for 2. It was an "inside job". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
9/11 all over again [/ QUOTE ] uh...temp ban? seriously |
![]() |
|
|