Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 06:30 PM
amulet amulet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,778
Default Review

I ordered Professional No lImit when it first came out and read it promptly. I had problems with the book. However, I chose to withhold my comments to see what others thought. I have been surprised at the comments. While I think it may be the best NL book out to date, I don't think it is a very good book. Nor is it a book that will teach a player how to become a much better No Limit player.

The book does stress position, which is incredibly important in NL. It also stresses controlling the size of the pot. This is also very important. However, controlling the pot size is one of MANY important things that must be taken into account when playing a No Limit hand. The authors chose to make this single concept the focus of a huge amount of the book, instead of one of the many concepts that must be taken into account in nl play. This is a major error.

Additionally, I found the "SPR" very artificial, and not really a way to teach how to play no limit.

The key to controlling pot size is the bet that is made post flop or on the turn (or the decision not to bet). Players should think of somewhere between the 2ed and 3ed bet that they make (without a huge hand) as the key point.

I has problems with other parts of the book. One large mistake the authors make is to suggest that when you have a huge hand, to bet whatever you think your opponent will call. When you have a huge hand in NL you want to either make a very large bet, or get all of your money in in pieces. By betting big your opponent will often fold. However, the times your opponent plays will make you SIGNIFICANTLY more money then betting what you expect him to call. A large part of NL's profit comes from the times that you are able to win huge pots. By betting what you expect him to call, over time you are losing a lot of money (that you would otherwise win). Of course, this is opponent and situationally dependent, however, it is very important and something the authors completely missed.

I could go on. However, I will let others comment first.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:56 PM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: Review

[ QUOTE ]
to bet whatever you think your opponent will call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
By betting big your opponent will often fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

???

Pretty obvious contradiction here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:42 PM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,269
Default Re: Review

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
to bet whatever you think your opponent will call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
By betting big your opponent will often fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

???

Pretty obvious contradiction here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all.

It's better to bet $100 and be called 15% of the time then bet $10 and be called 100% of the time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.