#1
|
|||
|
|||
BB/100
what do you think is a good BB/100 winning rate for a good NL middle limit player on average??
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
400 babies
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
all of them
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
-0.2PTBB
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
3-4 would be pretty darn good if u 6+ table
lol this is prob gonna be the only post that won't be making fun of u |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
no problem as far as i am on the winning side ...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
6
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
6 [/ QUOTE ] 6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
I consider multitabling 10+ tables [/ QUOTE ] haha what are your thoughts on polygamy? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
yeah i was loling at multi tabling being defined at 10+ tables too. jesus god man. i know plenty of people do it, but i don't think its at all standard.
|
|
|