#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
jullius raises $15. [/ QUOTE ] |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 48.133% 47.04% 01.09% 503424 11693.00 { AsKs } Hand 1: 51.867% 50.77% 01.09% 543380 11693.00 { random } lol tarath, read the pf action... utg limp/min rr/checked flop... i dont care for a flop bet nielso put in like ANY range for BTN... this is a very meh push. that said i do it in some similar spots and see a huge huge range of hands from air to two pair... it is very thin though [/ QUOTE ] lol this kinda of logic says bluffing the river is always wrong with 22 on an 10,10,9,9,A board. I have zero equity against a random hand lol. The random hand doesn't always call, You actually have a lot of FE. The pf action makes a bluff here even scarier. If anything your argument says anything it says why a c/c is so bad. Even if Nielso read was the the villian had ATC calling here is much worse than betting if you think you can bluff out the bottom chunk of his range. [/ QUOTE ] it's not "FOLD YOUR BAD AGAINST A RANDOM HAND" 1) he doesnt have FE 2) nielso's move is extremely thin (i do it too a lot) 3) so you're saying he should b/c instead of c/c the problem is that if he bets, shorty pushes and pfrr calls or reraises nielso loses more money than if he c/f when pfrr gets in pot. If it is heads up with short stack, b/c >> c/c, as it is, c/c>>b/c because pfrr checking flop is scary to me after shorty reopens action to him. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
You are fast becoming SSNLs Recallme. [/ QUOTE ] |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
Bram,
Raise up way more. Unless it's PL ofcourse. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
Thread summary- Nielsio mashes buttons, gets lucky, and claims he had a read. The other 20 times this didn't work out, he instead posted about the planted explosives that brought down the Twin Towers on 2+2 [/ QUOTE ] |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Thread summary- Nielsio mashes buttons, gets lucky, and claims he had a read. The other 20 times this didn't work out, he instead posted about the planted explosives that brought down the Twin Towers on 2+2 [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Countdown to busto http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
Bram, Raise up way more. Unless it's PL ofcourse. [/ QUOTE ]I usually pick up the pot, or get it HU when I raise to $15 in these spots. Could you elaborate why raising to $19 is better? Just to take it down pf right? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bram, Raise up way more. Unless it's PL ofcourse. [/ QUOTE ]I usually pick up the pot, or get it HU when I raise to $15 in these spots. Could you elaborate why raising to $19 is better? Just to take it down pf right? [/ QUOTE ] Because you'll get 15 callers and you have no pair and you are oop. And yes, just taking it down is profitable on it's own. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Thread summary- Nielsio mashes buttons, gets lucky, and claims he had a read. The other 20 times this didn't work out, he instead posted about the planted explosives that brought down the Twin Towers on 2+2 [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Countdown to busto http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho [/ QUOTE ] wahahaha. yes, because if the government wanted to bring down the twin towers I'm sure they'd use the NY Fire Department to do it. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 A typical Nielsio no-pair situation
Im starting to think that nielso and fgators are both gimmicks created by the same person.
hows that for a conspiracy theory? |
|
|