|
View Poll Results: traz | |||
Exactly what I expected | 0 | 0% | |
Pretty much what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Kinda what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Not really what I expected | 11 | 47.83% | |
Definitely not what I expected | 8 | 34.78% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#471
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Firstly, there is no "bug". There are only two ways to know other people's hole cards: Crack the RNG Inside job [/ QUOTE ] You can also hack into the server and modify your account or read other players' holecard data there somehow (e.g. sifting through RAM or tapping outgoing packets). This is how the Highlands breach was accomplished IIRC. [/ QUOTE ] True, hacking is an option, but even more unlikely than the options listed usually. My point was basically THERE IS NO middle stakes or small stakes super-users running around. It obviously stems from near the top level. And I have reasonable suspicion that Mark is involved, but probably not just him. |
#472
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fwiw the mod thread is exactly like this thread, but shorter. hand histories, stories, stats, etc. [/ QUOTE ] ive searched but cant find the mod thread, please link [/ QUOTE ] um wow. Epic fail. [/ QUOTE ] help i still cant find it. please no rickroll. |
#473
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
You can also hack into the server and modify your account or read other players' holecard data there somehow (e.g. sifting through RAM or tapping outgoing packets). This is how the Highlands breach was accomplished IIRC. [/ QUOTE ] link about highlands breach? i did searches on google no results |
#474
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
WTF
Signed, IWEARGOGGLES |
#475
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You can also hack into the server and modify your account or read other players' holecard data there somehow (e.g. sifting through RAM or tapping outgoing packets). This is how the Highlands breach was accomplished IIRC. [/ QUOTE ] link about highlands breach? i did searches on google no results [/ QUOTE ] Good question. It's briefly mentioned here and here, but I can't find any decent account of it. The story I heard was that Doyle (who endorsed the site at the time) was playing someone at heads-up limit, when he felt that he wasn't getting a fair game. He asked Highlands staff to check through the hand history logs and found a hand where the guy had had AQ vs doyle's 22 on the board AQ2 and played it as check call, check call, check fold. It was later found that the server had been compromised. Don't really know if that's true or not. Not a lot of attention got paid at the time because Highlands was a pretty small and crappy site, the cheating was caught pretty quickly, and when the site went under Doyle reimbursed all the players out of his own pocket (even though he didn't have a stake in the site). |
#476
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
It's in the mod forum, which can only be accessed by *gasp*...wait for it...
mods! |
#477
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
Firstly, there is no "bug". There are only two ways to know other people's hole cards: Crack the RNG Inside job So please stop saying that "other people could miraculously have found out how to see holecards, if one person is doing it then maybe 200 are." It just simply is obviously false. You think AP sends packets of everyone's holecards immediately? That would be the most retarded coding in the world. Yes there could be more "insiders" but its not like joe blow hacker from the street could miraculously see hole cards just by being good with computers. [/ QUOTE ] I agree that an inside job is more likely because people are the weakest link in any security plan, but it's totally possible that there is a flaw in their server that can be exploited. And you're crazy if you think that a) only one person/team would find it and b) it would stay secret forever |
#478
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
I don't know if this is obvious to everyone else, but in thinking about how this would be different on Stars or Full Tilt, I realized that having pros attached to the site offers the player a degree of protection. Here we are, with a compelling case for cheating, and our only hope of getting someone to follow up is by convincing someone in Costa Rica, who may or may not be in on the scam, that there is something wrong.
By having a stable of endorsing pros you have a group of people who ostensibly understand probability, math and poker logic. Actions like this would destory value for pros who endorse a site and they would have a huge incentive to pressure the site for an explanation. We would also have a name and a face to go to as some form of recourse. I hardly think Mark Seif qualifies. So if this was Stars we would ask Raymer to review the evidence, if Stars was unwilling, and he would be hard pressed to ignore it with his reputation on the line as well. |
#479
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's quite probable that there are numerous of these accounts floating around at the lower to mid-stakes games at AP, but with more intelligent people utilising the advantage in a way which wouldn't arouse so much suspicion. [/ QUOTE ] I doubt this, my personal experience there (a lot of hands) has been me beating just about everyone up. I wouldn't be running above 5ptbb/100 if this was true |
#480
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
wow
It's clearly rigged. I don't understand how people can argue with that, the evidence is simply overwhelming. Good luck everyone involved with getting your money back. ikestoys - how much did they steal? Spechel EDD - really surprised you can also post content. |
|
|