#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] I think some people actually try to get there moneies in while they are ahead rather than a 2:1 dogish... lol |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] I think some people actually try to get there moneies in while they are ahead rather than a 2:1 dogish... lol [/ QUOTE ] you're joking, right? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
ez shove
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
do you think villain can do big bluff since your aces are face up?
I fold this against random to nitty, and shove against crazy LAGtard who is capable of reraising with any str8 draw to push you off. I think the most important is : do you reraise only good aces? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
[ QUOTE ]
ez shove [/ QUOTE ] Loc: making the dumbest posts in the history of 2+2 i'm confused... [ QUOTE ] I think the most important is : do you reraise only good aces? [/ QUOTE ] I don't just 3bet good aces but this is the first hand that villain has seen me 3bet. He has just seen me opening/raising limpers a decent amount and a couple times folded to shoves from a shortstack. Postflop, i've done nothing crazy. [ QUOTE ] fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] i folded cause we were kinda deep. I think getting ~2:1 its a easy call. I got odds to call against 2pair, and all draws. But i'm crushed against sets and i dont see him going nuts with 1pair+livecards hands since i obviously have AAxx a lot here. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
It's an easy call at 2 to 1 but a fold at 1.8 to 1?
You go from needing 33% equity to needing 35.5% equity. Just take a look at pete's post if you have any doubts about whether you have 35.5% equity vs his range. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see him going nuts with 1pair+livecards hands since i obviously have AAxx a lot here. [/ QUOTE ] if you have "no reads", as you professed in the OP, this statement is ridiculous. going nuts with 1 pair + live cards against a likely aces hand is totally standard. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
I'd get it in there too. Also, I would've bet more like 30 or full pot instead of 25.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
the people that said fold really suck at poker
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: probably standard AAxx hand
stick it in not close really from equity / odds standpoint
also preflop gotta repop, the hand just is too strong and plays too well to not get more money in |
|
|