|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
I get that, and probably should've formulated my self a lill different, but my English ain't all that great.. Anyways, I can't see any argument for not c-betting paired boards, when you get to pick it up for a small price, or find out exactly where you stand.. of course K83 rainbow would be a better candidate, but....
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
You find out where you stand if he double barrels for the same price and sometimes he'll fire as a bluff.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
Now what about 3 handed. Everyone checks to you?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
you'll pick the pot up far more than 1/3 of the times you do it tho.. cause even tho he has marked him self with aces, he could just as well be holding the paired card, and not many will 2-barrel this without trips, especially in a squeeze 3-way, having the honest player at the end... It happen, and sometimes on a pure bluff, but it's still a profitable play..
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
I like to check behind paired rainbow boards or paired boards with the NFD when I have AAxx because you're almost never getting value from a worse hand when you bet and you're really not worried about a free card at all, so the goal should be to get to showdown.
After you check behind the flop, you can induce a bluff and actually be able to call it down and you're also more likely to get something like a worse overpair to call. I tend to think that paired boards play more like hold'em in that the value of your hand's more absolute and concepts like pot control become very relevant. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
with NFD I totally agree, without that, or being OOP I bet.. if the pot is sizable, I think you should protect, from running cards and 2 outers, cause it will outdraw you quite often...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cbetting AAxx
I bet if there's a FD I don't have too. I said AA+NFD or AA on paired rainbow board.
|
|
|