#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FUH KIN WIERD
i havent read the thread yet but i think its is a fold. it is v hard to put him on a hand but i think given the board and and his bet sizing he will show up with a huge hand a lot despite having checked the turn.
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FUH KIN WIERD
hustler,
every time you go to snap off a bluff, do you say to yourself "I'm not going to call here because if I call here, and if he knew I was going to call here, then this would have been a great way for him to play a big hand?" - TWP |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FUH KIN WIERD
[ QUOTE ]
the aejones theorem is infallible to the superior play(sic) [/ QUOTE ] |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FUH KIN WIERD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] against this guy maybe c/c flop? [/ QUOTE ] seems weak as the pfr, top of my c-betting range prob [/ QUOTE ] its not weak and its not the top of your range so i just dont understand this. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FUH KIN WIERD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] against this guy maybe c/c flop? [/ QUOTE ] seems weak as the pfr, top of my c-betting range prob [/ QUOTE ] its not weak and its not the top of your range so i just dont understand this. [/ QUOTE ] then i think it defines my hand and i dont' want to get in a habit of polarizing my range |
|
|