|
|
|
|
#1
08-21-2007, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ethics of stalling vs. EV
[ QUOTE ]
You would not be allowed to do this in a live tournament. [/ QUOTE ] Who would stop you as you agonize over your decisions? Other players call the clock on you? So you get 1 minute for each decision? Seems to be just putting them on tilt.... Ok, you can flame me for this one: Would it not be to the advantage of a large chip leader to slow down the action so the blinds will put more pressure on the smaller stacks? 
|
|
#2
08-21-2007, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ethics of stalling vs. EV
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You would not be allowed to do this in a live tournament. [/ QUOTE ] Who would stop you as you agonize over your decisions? Other players call the clock on you? So you get 1 minute for each decision? Seems to be just putting them on tilt.... [/ QUOTE ] The floor would stop you if you routinely stalled and someone complained. They would put a clock on you immediately before every action, and if you kept stalling, they would give you a penalty.
|
|
#3
08-21-2007, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ethics of stalling vs. EV
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You would not be allowed to do this in a live tournament. [/ QUOTE ] Who would stop you as you agonize over your decisions? Other players call the clock on you? So you get 1 minute for each decision? Seems to be just putting them on tilt.... Ok, you can flame me for this one: Would it not be to the advantage of a large chip leader to slow down the action so the blinds will put more pressure on the smaller stacks? [/ QUOTE ] Or you could receive a penalty for not conducting yourself as a lady or gentleman.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
