#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
hah...just read the first one...ldo
Syracuse under 4.5 wins bet 3.15u to win 3u |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
FUTURE BEAT OF THE YEAR
Notre Dame under 7.5 wins bet 7.8u to win 6u |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
what site is this on?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
ND total is on Bodog
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
thanks, i'm on it gl this year
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
i like rutgers u10 but so does everyone else it seems
line is -240 at most books who have 10 some have u9.5 at -125 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
How big of an edge do you guys require to make this bets that take so long to settle?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
well...since I have money laying around
for me personally, if the edge is greater than the 2.5% I'd gain on the money from a CD, I bet it. But, I do derive utility from having long-term bets to keep me in action. For all these posted, the edge is greater than 5%. I will say the Notre Dame bet has a huge edge, but the bet was only so big do the max limit. Every other gambling site had that line 30 or more cents higher than -130! My game-by-game breakdown of the Irish and their season had them at -200 to finish below 7.5 wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This made me suspicious that my anti-Notre Dame sentiment is clouding my judgment. However, with nearly every other book agreeing that Bodog is off, I'm likely to believe the other books. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
Can someone with a less biased look give me some insight into the Kansas line?
We play 4 cream puffs in the non-con. I would say the mean wins in non-con has got to be 3.3 at least. Then 5 against the pathetic Big 12 North and 3 more against what are generally the weaker teams in the south. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NCAAF Team totals plays
I've been on the board on Kansas--leaning towards betting it
I think they hit 6 right on about 65% of the time |
|
|