Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:30 PM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dodging bans since \'03.
Posts: 3,042
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

To value bet the river, and fold to a raise.

You've just bet three streets, he'd have to be a maniac to bluff you here.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:32 PM
iraise50 iraise50 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 121
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

I don't play at these stakes very often at all, why did you bet only 3/4 of the pot on the flop? Do you often do that with over pairs after re-raising to 13BB PF?
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:33 PM
tarheeljks tarheeljks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: stone that the builder refused
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

this flop is very dry, 3/4 is plenty
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:34 PM
mce86 mce86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,140
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could see myself doing the same bet here on the river with QQ-KK. His bets were weak on the flop, and then he checked the turn. Id take the river as a poss. bluff, and since I had alot more than a bluff cather, I could make the case to raise. More likely to do it with QQ than AA IMO.
What is villian putting Hero on based on the way he played it? To me it looks like a complete miss, it certainly doesnt look like KK.

[/ QUOTE ]
So you put me on nothing, but bluff-raise with QQ anyway?

That makes no sense.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not nothing, but 3-bettin im putting you on a big hand. Maybe you have KK and might lay it down....lol..and if You call im hoping you had JJ and were just timid.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:37 PM
Triptanes Triptanes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nacogdoches
Posts: 594
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

[ QUOTE ]
WOOLYGIMP:

Can you pleaseexplain what your river plan is after you bet and are called on the turn as per MCE86's request upthread?

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]

Holy... [censored]... [censored] does the advice in this forum suck.

If someone is wholeheartedly trying to improve they should post in MSNL, and I'm being incredibly serious. This post is a trainwreck.

Bet the flop.

Bet the turn!

Value bet and block the river.

As played, fold to the raise.

C/C the turn is horrendous for several reasons. You let him dictate the betsize, you let him take the initiative, you let him take a free card, you don't extract value when ahead, AND most importantly you gain absolutely no information about his hand.

Calling this river is horrendous (unless you have a read), and is very -ev in the long run. You turned your cards face up, and he still shows strength. The only hand you beat is a bluff.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:50 PM
mce86 mce86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,140
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

[ QUOTE ]
To value bet the river, and fold to a raise.

You've just bet three streets, he'd have to be a maniac to bluff you here.

[/ QUOTE ]
The reason why the check on the turn is okay, in this example, is that you save money by waiting to bet the river and get raised off your hand. Obv, if you bet the turn, your river value bet would be costing you a ton of money! You've basically just jammed a ton of value in there, just to find out youve been dead the whole way. That is why the check on the turn is okay....he was suspicious, and didnt want to jam it up.

Now, after seeing the big call with top pair QT in your other hand, Villian could really regard you as quite loose and put you on top pair again, giviing all the more reason to raise you on the river with QQ.

SInce you didnt jam the pot up and kept it under control, thats why i dont mind a loose river call..even If I lose Ive also gained some info. on my opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 07-25-2007, 05:58 PM
tarheeljks tarheeljks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: stone that the builder refused
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could see myself doing the same bet here on the river with QQ-KK. His bets were weak on the flop, and then he checked the turn. Id take the river as a poss. bluff, and since I had alot more than a bluff cather, I could make the case to raise. More likely to do it with QQ than AA IMO.
What is villian putting Hero on based on the way he played it? To me it looks like a complete miss, it certainly doesnt look like KK.

[/ QUOTE ]
So you put me on nothing, but bluff-raise with QQ anyway?

That makes no sense.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not nothing, but 3-bettin im putting you on a big hand. Maybe you have KK and might lay it down....lol..and if You call im hoping you had JJ and were just timid.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is spewy.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 07-25-2007, 09:44 PM
Mister Havisham Mister Havisham is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: You can\'t guard Jay Williams
Posts: 18
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

Based on the read and how deep it is, I'd bet turn, and fold to raise(but not a tiny one). Also bet most rivers about .5 pot, and fold to decent sized raise.

You can fold to a turn raise here with more confidence than in some other spots because of how deep it is. From my experience players tighten up a ton when it is 200bb deep online. Plus you called the huge flop raise in the blind battle with top pair. Also, villain fears AA to some degree and doesn't expect you to fold it on that turn.

Fold river as played
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 07-25-2007, 10:19 PM
crunny crunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 590
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

For those in the b/f turn camp:

We are only b/f because villain is described as loose/passive, right?
If villain was loose/Aggro monkey then c/c or c/r would be better, right?
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 07-25-2007, 10:58 PM
shark6 shark6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MPLS
Posts: 933
Default Re: 200 NL, KK in a sick spot, 200+ BB deep.

[ QUOTE ]
For those in the b/f turn camp:

We are only b/f because villain is described as loose/passive, right?
If villain was loose/Aggro monkey then c/c or c/r would be better, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes and yes for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.