Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2007, 06:54 PM
rudd4y rudd4y is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Default My first PT results ever

well got PT the other day and started with clean histories so heres my stats. what are they like. i know this is a small sample but was curious

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2007, 06:59 PM
AFCBeer AFCBeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: My first PT results ever

I think you are playing from the SB too much
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-22-2007, 06:59 PM
rjacobs003 rjacobs003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 469
Default Re: My first PT results ever

Sample is way too small to give decent feedback on ruddy. Also, what level are you playing? Is this 6-max or full-ring?, etc ,etc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-22-2007, 07:04 PM
rudd4y rudd4y is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Default Re: My first PT results ever

the pic is rly bad haha how do you post a pic directly on the forum. am playing $.10 FR atm. i think i complete in the SB alot as well i complete with all but the worst is this bad ui just look at it as pot odds is this wrong. sorry to be a noob just wanted to plug any leaks before i sink
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-22-2007, 07:15 PM
AFCBeer AFCBeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: My first PT results ever

The thing with completing in the SB is that it is not just about the immediate pot odds. You have to ask "how much am I going to lose if hit a decent hand after the flop".

For example, you complete with 83o. The best you are likely to flop here is bottom 2 and that will only happen 1 time in 50. Now if no one else flops anything you will probably just win a small pot. However, bottom 2 can so easily be counterfeited or overtaken by drawing hands that you could make a very expensive 2nd best hand.

Ask yourself, would you limp with this hand on the button? If not then you certainly don't want to be completing with it in the worst possible position on the table. Try to restrict completing to hands which can make the nuts. For that reason 65 is a much better hand than Q6.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-22-2007, 07:21 PM
rudd4y rudd4y is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109
Default Re: My first PT results ever

thanks AFCBeer that cleared things up abit hopefully thats plugged one of those leaks. thanks man!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-22-2007, 07:22 PM
jessyj07 jessyj07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melting in Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,266
Default Re: My first PT results ever

sample size is way to much to know anything at all. but fwiw...

You're not aggressive enough preflop
You're not aggressive enough on the river, though that is likely because of the small sample size
You complete the sb way way to often.
Your W$WSF is not high enough because you're not aggressive enough.
You don't fold your sb or bb to steal often enough.
You call down to much.
Your stats are those of a calling station and not a TAG.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-22-2007, 07:33 PM
mvdgaag mvdgaag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chasing Aces
Posts: 1,022
Default Re: My first PT results ever

hard to read the pixelated stuff..

Be more agressive and more selective... Raise more hands preflop. Attack blinds
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.