#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
Brutal play by the 97 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
brutal ninja edit [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Urrr. Don't know about the flop call. [/ QUOTE ] i understand that you're a nit and all, but 20:2 with 4 outs to the nuts and good relative position == straightforward call. [/ QUOTE ] lol. Yeah, I'm working on that nit problem. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
Looks right to me.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
Post flop I agree, but unless the game tends to be very passive, I hate to limp with ATo in that early of a position. I'd fold first, raise second, call third. But after the flop I think it was fine. Maybe fold flop but that is kind of nitty for those odds
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
Raise preflop.
Surely UTG+1 would c/r the river if he made his flush? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value vs Protection (I went for Value!)
Not if he thinks I'm afraid of it.
|
|
|