#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hellmuth\'s Place?
With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
...no.
You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
...no. You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title. [/ QUOTE ] No Limit is not even the favorite game of the cash gamers today. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
...no. You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title. [/ QUOTE ] Sooooo, hellmuth isnt a winning cash player? Hes not good enough? He might be good enough to beat 1/2, maybe 2/4 and possibly 3/6 if he runs good. But then again....he might not be good enough he just wins tournaments. or are you trying to say he has to beat the highest stakes possible to be a winning cash player? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player? [/ QUOTE ] this is a gimmick account right????? lolololol Phil is probably one of the top 3 NL tourney players against a weak field that is typified by the WSOP. Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field. As a NL cash player Phil is a player that pros love to have at their tables, a tourney donk who thinks he can play the same way in a cash games as a tournament. Cant believe I even wasted time to write this. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player? [/ QUOTE ] this is a gimmick account right????? lolololol Phil is probably one of the top 3 NL tourney players against a weak field that is typified by the WSOP. Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field. As a NL cash player Phil is a player that pros love to have at their tables, a tourney donk who thinks he can play the same way in a cash games as a tournament. Cant believe I even wasted time to write this. [/ QUOTE ] Just about every big name poker pro was in this event....isn't that good enough?? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ...no. You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title. [/ QUOTE ] Sooooo, hellmuth isnt a winning cash player? Hes not good enough? He might be good enough to beat 1/2, maybe 2/4 and possibly 3/6 if he runs good. But then again....he might not be good enough he just wins tournaments. or are you trying to say he has to beat the highest stakes possible to be a winning cash player? [/ QUOTE ] To be considered the best; I think you need to beat the highest stakes....or is that not right? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
lol am i getting leveled?
1. pro:amateur ratio 2. yes, no limit is more popular than limit now 3. you have an argument if you say he's the best no limit hold'em tournament player. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
Phil has done extremely well the last two years at the WPT Championship at Bellagio. Also, I'm pretty sure a few good players play in these WSOP events, but I can't be certain.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
[ QUOTE ]
Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field. [/ QUOTE ] like the tournament of champions or the national heads-up championship???? |
|
|