#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
Here are two hands I played recently at the Bellagio. How do you play them?
1. 22344689TTJQK 2. 234567899QKAA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
1. TT942 86432 QJK
or 4422Q J9863 TTK 2. AAQ86 23457 99K or 56789 2349Q AAK i would normally play the one picked on top, but I don't know what's best. I have a case of the sucks, but I'm interested in seeing what others do. Velocity |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
[ QUOTE ]
Here are two hands I played recently at the Bellagio. How do you play them? 1. 22344689TTJQK 2. 234567899QKAA [/ QUOTE ] You play 2-4, right? I will have to put an option in to calculate 1-6 values as well. #1: 9TJQK 23468 24T and expect to lose $110 on average (-1.1 points, 7355 sample hands). Nothing else is remotely competitive. 9TJQK 2368T 244 comes in at about -1.6 points. What an ugly hand. #2: I think this is an obvious AA/99 split with the wheel in the middle. I ran my calculator which seems to agree: 68QAA 23457 99K is worth -$29 (7377 sample hands), while 56789 2349Q KAA loses $47 instead. (By accident I entered an A9874 flush. The AA/99 split is still best over 4789A-flush 23569 QKA, which is about -$39.) (My 100K-hand experiment is still running and might actually converge. I will put up the 200K hands for both players eventually. I also started a 1-million hand sample which should provide better hand values, but that takes a while.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
In the first one you missed the interesting alternative of playing straight in the back, with 44 in front or without the pair in front.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
[ QUOTE ]
2. AAQ86 23457 99K or 56789 2349Q AAK [/ QUOTE ] What about 99Q86, 23457, AAK? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2. AAQ86 23457 99K or 56789 2349Q AAK [/ QUOTE ] What about 99Q86, 23457, AAK? [/ QUOTE ] Not legal. The front has to be weaker than the back. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chinese Poker 2-7 hands Played Recently $100 point
You play 2-4, right?
Las Vegas and Commerce always 2-4. I never played 1-6 |
|
|