#291
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
By the way, here's my sweet multitabling setup:
Bobman0330 seemed a little surprised that it didn't involve a chair. --Nate EDIT: Or a mouse. |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
[ QUOTE ]
By the way, here's my sweet multitabling setup: Bobman0330 seemed a little surprised that it didn't involve a chair. --Nate [/ QUOTE ] i see you went for the modern anti-baller set up. Very nice. Ness |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
How on earth do you 8-table without a mouse? You are highly skilled sir, nicely done.
|
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
Lolz that looks exactly like a grad student room.
Anyhow, boom headshot huzzah etc. I guess the SNGs really are the way to build a roll from 'scratch'. I wish I would've believed this awhile ago when I was grinding out my my 1st K on cash tables. What would be really cool, though i'm aware you're probably sick of looking at a computer, is a link to the thread that this prop originated in, or at least a point in the general direction. Great job, congrats. |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
[ QUOTE ]
By the way, here's my sweet multitabling setup: Bobman0330 seemed a little surprised that it didn't involve a chair. --Nate EDIT: Or a mouse. [/ QUOTE ] Nate: Any back-of-the-envelope estimate/guess as how it would have gone if you had two 30" monitors and an Aeron chair, mouse, etc. Was the screen size a major constraint? Would you have played more tables with a bigger setup? congrats again. matt p.s. - If you had played it right, I think someone might have layed you 5-1 or even 10-1, although I think once you got to $150, you were a massive (maybe 4-1?) favorite. |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
I suddenly thing this is a hoax.. there's no way you could have done this without a mouse. How else are you gonna get the precise mouse cursor shaking required to get Stars' RNG to help you suckout on the river.
|
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
[ QUOTE ]
Chump-- Here. --Nate [/ QUOTE ] Awesome, thanks. Now I understand the reference earlier to gettym. You really did a cool thing here. No matter how much I or others say say it, how's it totally possible and feasible to build a roll from 'scratch', when it comes down to it people just have to see it for themselves. |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] By the way, here's my sweet multitabling setup: Bobman0330 seemed a little surprised that it didn't involve a chair. --Nate EDIT: Or a mouse. [/ QUOTE ] Nate: Any back-of-the-envelope estimate/guess as how it would have gone if you had two 30" monitors and an Aeron chair, mouse, etc. Was the screen size a major constraint? Would you have played more tables with a bigger setup? congrats again. matt p.s. - If you had played it right, I think someone might have layed you 5-1 or even 10-1, although I think once you got to $150, you were a massive (maybe 4-1?) favorite. [/ QUOTE ] Matt-- Eh, 12-tabling on that thing wasn't too bad. I'm pretty sure that the limiting factors were things that a sweet setup wouldn't have fixed (mental processing, etc). Supposing I played with the same diligence for the same 6 days 19 hours 15 minutes, I might have played... hmm... two-ish more tables 2/3 of the time? Once I hit the 45-man SNGs that's another few bucks an hour. And I would have hit that phase sooner... yikes, maybe I left a few hundred on the table. Actually, wait. I played all (actually, I might have missed exactly one) of the $11x45 SNGs during those 13 hours yesterday. So I guess the rate at which those SNGs go off is a limitation. So I'd have been adding less profitable games of some sort. Really the thing is that I might have been able to play a few more hours if I'd been more comfortable. Sitting on an air mattress and leaning against a wall isn't the best. Final estimate: $165. --Nate |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week-long prop bet
Nice job Nate. |
|
|