Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2006, 02:17 PM
MagCFO MagCFO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 189
Default Re: New Thread on 2+2\'s Statement Re the PPA

[ QUOTE ]
As a tax accountant, the PPA could be in trouble (as Sniper mentioned) by not having their Form 990 available for public inspection. It's a requirement for a 501(c)(4) organization, that it be available for inspection by the public during business hours at the organization's offices. Now, the PPA may not have had to file the form yet (if 2006 was their first year in operation), but the WHOIS for them shows the domain was created in April 2005. Thus, the PPA should have filed a Form 990 for 2005 by some date in 2006 (this will depend on their fiscal year; if they're a calendar year organization the deadline was May 15, 2006).

Given the investigation by TwoPlusTwo's attorney, and my two-minute investigation, I have serious qualms about them. Nonprofits are supposed to have transparency in their operations. The PPA may know what's going on, but it appears that the poker-playing public doesn't and won't anytime in the near future.

Finally, a check of their website found that Greg Raymer is no longer on their board of directors. Additionally, I sent an email to the PPA asking them to reply in this thread.

-- Russ Fox

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't think Raymer was ever on the board. He and others went to DC to speak to Congress, but I don't think he was on the board.

I'm sure at some point he'll reply to this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:46 PM
Sniper Sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finance Forum
Posts: 12,364
Default Re: New Thread on 2+2\'s Statement Re the PPA

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As a tax accountant, the PPA could be in trouble (as Sniper mentioned) by not having their Form 990 available for public inspection. It's a requirement for a 501(c)(4) organization, that it be available for inspection by the public during business hours at the organization's offices. Now, the PPA may not have had to file the form yet (if 2006 was their first year in operation), but the WHOIS for them shows the domain was created in April 2005. Thus, the PPA should have filed a Form 990 for 2005 by some date in 2006 (this will depend on their fiscal year; if they're a calendar year organization the deadline was May 15, 2006).

Given the investigation by TwoPlusTwo's attorney, and my two-minute investigation, I have serious qualms about them. Nonprofits are supposed to have transparency in their operations. The PPA may know what's going on, but it appears that the poker-playing public doesn't and won't anytime in the near future.

Finally, a check of their website found that Greg Raymer is no longer on their board of directors. Additionally, I sent an email to the PPA asking them to reply in this thread.

-- Russ Fox

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't think Raymer was ever on the board. He and others went to DC to speak to Congress, but I don't think he was on the board.

I'm sure at some point he'll reply to this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Link to Nevada Secretary of State filing for PPA

It lists the following "active" Directors...

Michael Bolcerek
Greg Dinkin
Chris Ferguson
Jan Fischer
Linda Johnson
Howard Lederer
Mary Magazine
Greg Raymer
Allyn Shulman
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.