|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
it takes 4 min in the beginning of a session. Then later on it takes up to 15 minutes.. redicilous.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Mine is the opposite. First scan takes 5-10 min but scans after are much faster.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Is there a way to add multiple names to the list? and also, I'd like a way for the software to show when you're on the waiting list for a table, so you dont have to always go to it.
Also, PP scans for me take like 15 sec, while FT scans take a couple min |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
4 Minutes sounds not bad.
It may take a second until the PartPoker client delivers the playerlist of a table and then again 1-3 seconds to search your database for the statistics of the players. So to scan a table may take 1-5 seconds (or more if your database is realy big). Now you can compute how long a FullScan may take if there are 20-30 tables available... In fact the first scan should be always the slowest, but later scans should be a lot faster, because the data from the first scan is "reused"... The only way i can think of what is causing your "later" scans to be much longer is, that the data from the first scans is compromising your CPU too much. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Hello
I'm trying out SpadeEye and wish to say thanks for the great job done. I wish to adress a concern about Pokerstar support: as I know, you developped a specific table selection for PS and the tool is officially authorised by PS. Now, as I know, Telescope was released because it was too difficult to support PS in spadeEye, and SpadeEye do not permit datamining w/ PS. so my question is: why spadeEye is still in the PS blacklist? no it is impossible to play FT and PS table in the same time w/ SpadeEye opened (this was explicitly confirmed by PS' support) Would it be possible to prove to PS that SpadeEye is useless with their tables? thanks /Kader FR: forgive my weak english |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
I am cooperating with the PokerStars gaming commission.
And i sent PokerStars all information they need to test my tools for approval. In one of the previous SpadeEye versions i tried to integrate a serverside PokerStars support (for tableselection only, no datamining). Unfortunately PokerStars did not like this version and i had to remove the PokerStars support. So my last information about that is that PokerStars does not like the old SpadeEye version, but will not take any action against a player that uses todays SpadeEye version e.g. on Party while playing on Stars, too... I will contact PokerStars support again to clear this misunderstanding. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Hi mr snood, i have a quick question
I love the scoring system, and need to get a dozen rules set up. Unfortunatly, with the player filter in pt, i can only look at say vp>20 or vp<30, when i really need to look at players from vp 20-30, and then look at the total loss (from the thousand or so players all added up) in bb/100 hands Is there any chance that on the filter down the bottom of spadeeye, you can have totals of the colums? ie a total of hands, won, and then convert all of the hands and winnings to bb/100 hands? Ie, if i wanted to look at the 1million hands i have in pt, and then just filter those that have say, hands>100, vp from 25-30, pfr from 5-10, then i could get a total number of hands, and the bb/100hands won from all those players combined? It would make my rules SOOOO much easier and accurate! Thanks, and keep up the hard work Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Will you still support this now you have other products being launched?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)
Sure, i will. SpadeEye (and the others) will never die [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
They have my full attention. |
|
|