|
|
|
|
#1
06-16-2006, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: difference between anarchy and anarcho-capitalism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] When you get right down to it, thers'e not a lot of difference between anarcho-capitalists and Marxists. Although they envision a very different types of utopian societies. Both have equal probability of actually happening in the real world. Zero. [/ QUOTE ] This is an odd comment, given that both quasi -anarchist and quasi -Marxist societies have existed historically. [/ QUOTE ] And what happened to them? [/ QUOTE ] What does it matter? [/ QUOTE ] wow...just a complete loss for words. sorry. [/ QUOTE ] Typical of your arguments. [/ QUOTE ] I think I've gone into detail on a number of occasions despite my sometimes unorthodox ways thankyou. And as if you're not equally as guilty. As for your original question, your quazi-anarchist societies do not last because of the inevitablity of the most powerful and superior entity to rise up and sieze control of any society in which it has the ability to do so. 
|
|
#2
06-16-2006, 02:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: difference between anarchy and anarcho-capitalism
[ QUOTE ]
As for your original question, your quazi-anarchist societies do not last because of the inevitablity of the most powerful and superior entity to rise up and sieze control of any society in which it has the ability to do so. [/ QUOTE ] Lol. Thanks for saying absolutely nothing. "The reason that states arise is that it is inevitable that states arise in societies where states can arise."
|
|
#3
06-16-2006, 03:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: difference between anarchy and anarcho-capitalism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As for your original question, your quazi-anarchist societies do not last because of the inevitablity of the most powerful and superior entity to rise up and sieze control of any society in which it has the ability to do so. [/ QUOTE ] Lol. Thanks for saying absolutely nothing. "The reason that states arise is that it is inevitable that states arise in societies where states can arise." [/ QUOTE ] It has been explained to you guys over and over as to why it is inevitable. This thread is now about calling each other idiots. Also thanks for saying absolutely nothing. "The reason that states do not arise is that it is inevitable that states do not arise in societies where states can arise."
|
|
#4
06-16-2006, 03:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: difference between anarchy and anarcho-capitalism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] As for your original question, your quazi-anarchist societies do not last because of the inevitablity of the most powerful and superior entity to rise up and sieze control of any society in which it has the ability to do so. [/ QUOTE ] Lol. Thanks for saying absolutely nothing. "The reason that states arise is that it is inevitable that states arise in societies where states can arise." [/ QUOTE ] It has been explained to you guys over and over as to why it is inevitable. This thread is now about calling each other idiots. Also thanks for saying absolutely nothing. "The reason that states do not arise is that it is inevitable that states do not arise in societies where states can arise." [/ QUOTE ] Try to at least make your strawmen marginally coherent.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
