Constitutional Amendment

elwoodblues · #1 06-06-2006, 11:26 AM

Ignore for a moment whether you favor gay marriage or not. Ignore whether you think there are a band of runaway judges just trying to ram gay marriage down your throat (I love that imagery, by the way.)

Is this really something that should be a constitutional amendment?

Should the Constitution be Amended to create Super-legislation, or should a Constitutional Amendment be more than that?

Riddick · #2 06-06-2006, 11:28 AM

If its for the "general welfare" then it seems as though legislators can and "should" do anything they feel, right?

pvn · #3 06-06-2006, 11:31 AM

Still waiting for the "everyone gets a pony" amendment.

ericd · #4 06-06-2006, 11:37 AM

No. I know almost nothing about the law but what "trendy" issue would be next? I assume this is just placating the base.

DrunkHamster · #5 06-06-2006, 11:42 AM

You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. I say this as a Brit looking in at your whole political process, thinking WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document.

Kurn, son of Mogh · #6 06-06-2006, 11:43 AM

I don't think there should be any rules as to what should or should not be a valid topic for a Constitutional Amendment. The process is designed to make it hard for politcal whim to prevail, and we have history that shows a bad amendment can be undone.

Let the process do the talking.

irvman21 · #7 06-06-2006, 12:25 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. I say this as a Brit looking in at your whole political process, thinking WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document.

[/ QUOTE ]

What about the stuff that, you know, wasn't addressed in the document when it was originally written?

elwoodblues · #8 06-06-2006, 12:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
What about the stuff that, you know, wasn't addressed in the document when it was originally written?

[/ QUOTE ]

Like whether gays should be married or flags burned or alcohol consumed.

Stu Pidasso · #9 06-06-2006, 12:41 PM

The definition of marriage should be consistent accross all the states, and is something that should not change at a political whim. I think an admendment is necessary.

Stu

Brainwalter · #10 06-06-2006, 01:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You know what would be better? If, instead of worrying about amending the constitution, legislators followed it. ... WTF happened to half the stuff in the original document.

[/ QUOTE ]

I could not agree more.