![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raymer's 2004 and 2005
Harrington's 2003 and 2004 Cunningham winning bracelet in 3 consecutive years Chan's 1st, 1st, 2nd Madsen's 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> Hellmuth's 11 bracelets
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nowhere near any of those in my opinion. Still a good accomp. though.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
50K HORSE is an extremely high variance, small field tournament. Who cares.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
50K HORSE is an extremely high variance, small field tournament. Who cares. [/ QUOTE ] It's significantly lower than say...every other WSOP Event, with a much more skilled field. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It's significantly lower than say...every other WSOP Event, with a much more skilled field. [/ QUOTE ] Lower variance than every other WSOP event? Compared to the low buy-in NL events, sure, but give me a break. The structure for the HORSE event was bad, an average stack only needed to lose two 7 stud pots and suddenly they're almost out. And BTW don't buy into this nonsense that HORSE tournaments better determine who the best player is just because it's multiple games. In the end it is still limit poker, and it's a tournament, so anyone's edge is extremely diminished. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't matter, looks like hes busto
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chan by far. First, First, Second, even in small fields seems insane to me. But, what has he done for us lately?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|