#1
|
|||
|
|||
super/system flawed for uNL
For the readers that read super/systems NL holdem advice... It just doesn't work very well for me at uNL. This is because the players do not seem to notice your agression and fail to get into the folding habit. Since the system depends so much on folding equity you are just spewing chips against all these calling stations.
Also because many people buy in very short all the small suited connectors and small pairs are hardly worth playing against any opponent. What do you guys think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
Correct . . . so stop spewing chips on fold equity. ^_-
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
what's uNL?.... and yes, supersystem is for deep games.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
Doyle explains that when playing against weak players, just make a hand and bet it.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
whats uNL?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
uNL = Microstakes (The u is supposed to be a (Greek letter) mu which stands for micro). So as in the Micro Stakes forum, 50NL and below.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
I actually think there should be deep-stack tables, where 100bb is min. stack to be dealt a hand.
Playing MillerBots running GSiHE-1.0 is not much fun! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
supersystem gives you a base line. Obviously you should adjust to the table, if u keep playing this way against calling stations u are just plaina wful and should quit poker.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
"Playing MillerBots running GSiHE-1.0 is not much fun!"
Can you explain this in a little more detail? I mean as far as what you know about the bots and how many you estimate to be around. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: super/system flawed for uNL
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle explains that when playing against weak players, just make a hand and bet it. [/ QUOTE ] Thats one point. The other point is, if you play with aggression the other players are not able to play like the should. I recogniszed that the Smallstack (40 times the BB) is playing too lose. My opinion is that these players want to keep their loses small and buy in only for that amount. Would they play with only the High Cards and big pairs, the never would get in such a trouble the bottom line is the always in such a trouble and throw mostly the good money after the bad money (i hope you understand what i mean). But you can also play the board. Is there a street possibility or a flush possibility bet big. Look for bets in hands before their fold their cards. Is the bet big. Bet big. is the bet small - you now the rest [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Your betting strukture must fit into the big puzzel. But you cant expect that a uNL player folds his street against a Full house or Flush possibility! I have such problems too, but I know I am not allone. I would only fold in this example if I am on a playlevel where the other players can fold a big hand. You must now on which thinking level your opponents play. If you see a paired board with a possible street and he makes the pot big and shows to the end the street, you now he call every bet, when he thinks he is best. You now know he is a true callingstation [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|