Play Every Hand Last Longer?

[flyingmoose]

Rules are simple: We all register for the next $4.40/180. All players involved must never fold preflop, but can fold after the flop freely. $50 per participant, last one standing wins.

Reply to this thread to participate. I'm hoping a more established 2+2er will join in and hold the money, but I'll hold it if nobody else steps up. Anyone interested?

[flyingmoose]

Doesn't seem to be any interest so I'm going to put the idea on hold. Guess I'll have to get in on the next round of flippaments for my degenerate gambling needs.

[A_Junglen]

lol @ everyone doing what I say (flipaments/last shorters), and not what anyone else says.

[aditya]

wait, junglen, are you doing this or is flying doing is? If you are then I'm in, if not I'm out. J/k...I'd be interested flying.

[Jeff76]

This would be fun, though I think it would be sensable to put a cap on what you have to call PF. Like say 5 BBs. The fun for me in something like this would having an excuse to play rediculously loose, but having to call two all ins with 92o would just be irritating and not fun in the least.

$50 is a bit much for me, though, so there's also that. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[0evg0]

i'm in fo sho

[0evg0]

IM me at evg87 if you or anyone else is up for it right now, reg is at 110 so it wont be too long a wait

[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
This would be fun, though I think it would be sensable to put a cap on what you have to call PF. Like say 5 BBs. The fun for me in something like this would having an excuse to play rediculously loose, but having to call two all ins with 92o would just be irritating and not fun in the least.

[/ QUOTE ]
That sounds like a reasonable rule to me.

[zipppy]

[ QUOTE ]
This would be fun, though I think it would be sensable to put a cap on what you have to call PF. Like say 5 BBs. The fun for me in something like this would having an excuse to play rediculously loose, but having to call two all ins with 92o would just be irritating and not fun in the least.

$50 is a bit much for me, though, so there's also that. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

i think either this way or the OP's idea would be fun. calling with 92o would be no less fun than a flipament. the looseament idea could have more learning potential.

[Jeff76]

[ QUOTE ]
calling with 92o would be no less fun than a flipament.

[/ QUOTE ]True, but I figure if you want to do that, play a flipament [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
the looseament idea could have more learning potential.

[/ QUOTE ]Actually, I'm only responding becaues I love the term "looseament" [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I can see people having fun playing it both ways.

Any hope of doing a looseament for something like $10?