#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
The "Fold to river bet optimal value at 2/4-5/10" post inspired me to bump this.
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
My post includes a link to this post and please read the post again.
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
[ QUOTE ]
My post includes a link to this post and please read the post again. [/ QUOTE ] You misunderstood me. I know what your post contained. If this bump had been a reply to your post, it would have been done via the "reply" button within your post. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
OK [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
[ QUOTE ]
why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it. [/ QUOTE ] Can you sticky a seperate post with a link to it (like the digest)? |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
The big problem I have with these stats are that they are from average winners. 1.5BB/100 is nice but it's like seeing a .280 baseball player and saying I want to be just like him!
Don't get me wrong - it's interesting and I appreciate all the work but 1.5BB/100 is a tad low to be looking at stats. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it. [/ QUOTE ] Can you sticky a seperate post with a link to it (like the digest)? [/ QUOTE ] No. Apparently the problem is that we're not allowed to have more than two stickies. We're working on writing a new sticky to replace the current posting guidelines etc. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
"compiled" would likely work better in the title
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|