What can I do?

[Redgrape]

Stop bitching about results and we'll all be fine.

[thac]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
memorize all of PI

[/ QUOTE ]

ya do that

[/ QUOTE ]

and don't come back

[/ QUOTE ]

[smellmuth]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what's his w$wsf%?

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe I saw it at 39 somewhere.

That is inexcusable. A good player's at 1/2 should prob be around 45. This means there are 6 percent of hands that he's not winning that he could/should be.

[/ QUOTE ]

srsly? im at like 39% and 6ptbb over an extremely large sample at 1-2 which pots am i missing [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[Grey]

[ QUOTE ]
srsly? im at like 39% and 6ptbb over an extremely large sample at 1-2 which pots am i missing [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]The pots at pokerstars.

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what's his w$wsf%?

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe I saw it at 39 somewhere.

That is inexcusable. A good player's at 1/2 should prob be around 45. This means there are 6 percent of hands that he's not winning that he could/should be.

[/ QUOTE ]

srsly? im at like 39% and 6ptbb over an extremely large sample at 1-2 which pots am i missing [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

really? i guess you must play a lot of multiway pots you give up on?

maybe i've got this all backwards - might be focused too much on this stat.

[Janis N.]

If people are stations and pay you off when you have hands I think it's OK for won $ saw flop to be around 40%. If people get tighter and don't go to showdown as much as they do in tougher games then I think it becomes more important.

But maybe that's just my excuse for not winning my share of pots.

[smellmuth]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what's his w$wsf%?

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe I saw it at 39 somewhere.

That is inexcusable. A good player's at 1/2 should prob be around 45. This means there are 6 percent of hands that he's not winning that he could/should be.

[/ QUOTE ]

srsly? im at like 39% and 6ptbb over an extremely large sample at 1-2 which pots am i missing [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

really? i guess you must play a lot of multiway pots you give up on?

maybe i've got this all backwards - might be focused too much on this stat.

[/ QUOTE ]

im playing in much looser games than stars 1-2, ppl dont fold and lots of pots are multiway. im gonna check my stars db now im curious.

[Jay Riall]

Yah mine is like 41% over a decent sample at Party 1/2. I assume this is usual though because of the reasons Smellmuth just gave.

[aislephive]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what's his w$wsf%?

[/ QUOTE ]

Believe I saw it at 39 somewhere.

That is inexcusable. A good player's at 1/2 should prob be around 45. This means there are 6 percent of hands that he's not winning that he could/should be.

[/ QUOTE ]

srsly? im at like 39% and 6ptbb over an extremely large sample at 1-2 which pots am i missing [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

really? i guess you must play a lot of multiway pots you give up on?

maybe i've got this all backwards - might be focused too much on this stat.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fgators was at 36 or something last I saw. That's pretty pathetic at any limit/site. The fact that he was playing at Stars 200nl which is a pretty taggy game with a ton of tight regs makes it even more pathetic.

But yeah it depends on the site/stakes you play. At Party 200nl mine was 42, currently at 400nl it's 48 or so. However on Stars I've been able to run people over and maintain a W$SF of nearly 50, granted it was a small sample of a few thousand hands.

At Party 200nl I've seen very few people with a W$SF above 43. Most seem to be around 37-40.

[pp262]

Stop whining like a little bitch

Post an EV graph over a big sample or STFU