|
View Poll Results: No threadjacking rule | |||
Yes | 8 | 53.33% | |
No | 7 | 46.67% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
moneymakker is one of the biggest winners in my DB. Playing 20/10 must be profitable. [censored] I hate him.
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
Tons of people who used to play .5/1 on the 1/2 lists, pretty much all I agree are good (no wonder they moved up).
Best players at .5/1 right now: IanBarns - definitely the best IMO... a pain in my ass. Holdemhux - plays like 19/12... somehow owns me though xall12 - solid agstremist - solid syphlix - solid crappy but consistently owns me because I never have a hand and he always does: juandog111 |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Off the top of my head the best players without looking at PT. LanderD (semi-regular splits his time between 1/2 and 2/4 I think) Tecknowledgy (sure that's spelled wrong without looking at PT, but I'm pretty sure he plays FR and 6 max so good when he plays) Carrotsnake (probably not as good as his "legendary" status indicates and definitely not as spewy as I thought he would be, but obv good) Have 0 hands with legspin Mdom is really good, but he's playing almost all 2/4 now Greg1osu is super easy to play against (DON'T PAY HIM OFF LDO!) ZngelDay[9] IMO the best regular playing 1/2 full time Ldonnie is good too Dayninja I pretty much avoid sitting to my left [/ QUOTE ] Where do these people get off with these claims? Zngleday the best regular? LMAO. The guy is a spew-master. He's not horrible but he's nowhere near the best. Oh, and Jager...I literally almost folded AQ to you on that Q93Q9 board. I'm not just saying that. I know you are a good player and frankly I thought that I could have been beat there by quads; I almost typed it in the chat box but had no timebank from timing out all over the place for my constant chat and 12 tabling. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
lol...vs jager im felting 9x there relatively often
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
FGators- Either you are a ridiculous nit for contemplating a fold there or you need to listen to David Cross's standup on the use of the word "literally."
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
I think you play well, although the bulk of our hands were at 100NL.
My short list of tough players: Jager mdom Lucky_wins luckybacon futuredoc My sn is vexbot, i've only been playing online since June of this year (which is why my list is so short). By the way, if any winning Stars SSNLer has time today (6:30pm Pacific) to play in an FTOPS event on Tilt [I have a business dinner I don't think I can get out of] please PM me for details. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Since 6/1 til 8/13, from a database of 4.5 million hands of 200nl on stars. Top 10 PTBB/100 (20K hands min): kingsofcards pennpal gr33d1982 chilliwilly BGnight Quixotcist dullrazor purediesel1 booshiet funkeemonkee Top 10 Winners in $$$$ (20K hands min)- 7 of these 10 are over 4PTBB/100. needfood fasteddie267 pennpal bait455 luckybacon funkeemonkee quixotcist bidicha booshiet ChilliWilly not sure if it's cool to post the losers as well, so I won't [/ QUOTE ] there are obviously holes in this because i've put in 31,137 since 06/01 and am up enough to be at least top 3 on that list (at least in terms of ptbb/hourly) despite August raping me in the ass with a strap-on also, i've seen 4 of my students mentioned as "biggest winners", yet i'm the one to proverbially toot my own horn. interesting... |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
I think you play well, although the bulk of our hands were at 100NL. My short list of tough players: Jager mdom Lucky_wins luckybacon futuredoc My sn is vexbot, i've only been playing online since June of this year (which is why my list is so short). By the way, if any winning Stars SSNLer has time today (6:30pm Pacific) to play in an FTOPS event on Tilt [I have a business dinner I don't think I can get out of] please PM me for details. [/ QUOTE ] I can probably do this. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
What exactly is the purpose of this thread?
Is it so you can get SNs here and note good players. If they are good enough to get mentioned here I would think it pretty easy to find out they are quality simply after playing a few 100 hands with them. Is this simply a thread for people to see if others think they are any good? Just a big old poker beauty contest? |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
What exactly is the purpose of this thread? Is it so you can get SNs here and note good players. If they are good enough to get mentioned here I would think it pretty easy to find out they are quality simply after playing a few 100 hands with them. Is this simply a thread for people to see if others think they are any good? Just a big old poker beauty contest? [/ QUOTE ] ego stroking is the term i'd go with, it's more like a massage for the soul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|