#291
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
Thanks for the changes Lee. It feels nice to be listened to. Now if only I qualified for that bonus...
|
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
PLEASE ADD MONEYBOOKERS CASHOUT (the checks are very slow)
and reduce the sitout times |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
please fix the sb/btn for HU games, FT has it right, it can't be that hard to do
|
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *Official* Suggestions for Stars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is there an option to turn off player chat? I've been playing at Stars off-and-on for a year, and I've never found one. Please add it or make it more visible. [/ QUOTE ] Try unchecking this: [/ QUOTE ] Thanks. Don't think I've ever used the options button on the table. Guess I just assumed it wouldn't have extra options that weren't available elsewhere. Lee, instead of having *some* of the options available from the lobby and some only from the table, can we get everything available via the same dialog in both places? |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *Official* Suggestions for Stars Thread
it would be nice if the vip bonuses weren't so pathetic
|
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
[ QUOTE ]
PLEASE ADD MONEYBOOKERS CASHOUT (the checks are very slow) [/ QUOTE ] ePassporte would also be nice (offered by PP and FTP). |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
(Didn't read the whole thread)
Replicate Party's 109 NLHE MTTs at 6/8/10am. They only attracted between 80&100 players, but had a lot of regulars. Oh, and a party style lobby with all those filters would be great especially for someone (like me) not interested in rebuys, turbos, Omaha etc. |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *Official* Suggestions for Stars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Speed up turn and river for cash games all ins. [/ QUOTE ] Disagree. I like it the way it is. One of the reasons I would not play at Party when I was able to was because the turn and river were too fast -- I just watched where the chips went to see who won. I like the little bit of suspense in the turn and river. What are we talking about anyway ... 1-2 seconds per all in hand? |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time for \"Sit-Outs\"
[ QUOTE ]
PLEASE ADD MONEYBOOKERS CASHOUT (the checks are very slow) [/ QUOTE ] Do it, do it, do it...I guarantee at least one more sign-up [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *Official* Suggestions for Stars Thread
Lee,
Thanks for the new FPP system. I'm an SNGer, so it doesn't affect me, but the system for tourney players was already the industry best, so no complaints here. I'm wondering if you'll explain the reasoning behind offering this account specific bonus. The response that I got from CS was almost a slap in the face. I'm not going to crucify you over it, and I'm certainly not going to stop playing at Stars over it, but why do this? If you're looking to attract Party fishies, I would think that a sign-up bonus would be in order...not so much a reload. Also, wouldn't you want to attract high volume players as well? You're basically offering this bonus to a bunch of players who are highly unlikely to clear it. I understand that this looks good for the short term bottom line, but keep in mind that Party doing things EXACTLY like this is what drove a large volume of high volume MGR players away from Party and to your site because Stars didn't engage in the type of activity. This is a dangerous road to hoe my friend. I'm not saying you don't take care of your VIPs - you obviously do - but offering by far the biggest reload in the history of your site (or at least the last few years) to a bunch of players who won't clear it without offering it to the players who can actually use it is just shady. Please, please, please tell me I'm wrong about this. I want to be wrong about this. Any explanation would be appreciated. Thanks, DuderinoAB P.S. I still love the way the way you and Stars go about things (this thread is a perfect example) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|