#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 hands vs the same opponent.
[ QUOTE ]
just 4bet both AQ and 78s, problem solved [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Hero 3-bet, villain is the one who 4-bet. I can't imagine that 5-bet-shoving w/ 78s is better than w/ AQ. For one, as has already been touched in, its less likely that villain has AA, AK, or some other hand that is going to be happy to stack off w/. While in a vaccum 78s may perform slightly better against villains shove-calling range - when we 5-bet shove w/ 78s, we are just praying that villain does not have a hand. However when we have AQ, we at least know its slightly less likely that he has us absolutely crushed. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 hands vs the same opponent. w/ a lot of history/reads 1000 NL
id pay off riv hand 1, villain seems horrible.
hand 2 is fine hand 3 is spew |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 hands vs the same opponent. w/ a lot of history/reads 1000 NL
btw, AQ is better then 86s. not close. why is the sb range for getting it in, esp. given history and his hands, AA-JJ, AK? That's not right. it's bvb, it should be like:
equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 65.603% 55.27% 10.33% 511054968 95540226.00 { TT+, AQs+, AQo+ } Hand 1: 34.397% 24.06% 10.33% 222508740 95540226.00 { AQo } vs Board: Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 69.524% 69.32% 00.20% 294364748 870372.00 { TT+, AQs+, AQo+ } Hand 1: 30.476% 30.27% 00.20% 128545900 870372.00 { 86s } 5% is pretty massive |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|