#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: is 200 enough for 10nl
My rule is that I want to have 20x the buy-in per table at a certain buy-in level.
If I have $200, I play one table of 10NL. I can also play two tables of 5NL or five tables of 2NL. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: is 200 enough for 10nl
But the number of tables you're playing doesn't affect the variation now does it, so what's the logic behind your rule?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: is 200 enough for 10nl
How did you grind $150 in 4 days at 5NL?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: is 200 enough for 10nl
the short answer, is yes.
coles notes for ya. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: is 200 enough for 10nl
If you are winning then its enough, though without loggin some time at NL5 cant just say you will tear up NL10+ or you are just running hot against donks. Hardest part for me transitioning was to the smaller stacks. With more people having 100-200BB stacks it made the draws better as you would get paid off more then with shallow stacks.
I'd say take a few buyin shots at 10, if ya lose them then go back to nl5 for awhile till ya got a bit more then you have beofore your first shot then try again. Shots are fine but you need to get your roll up enough that you arent thinking of you bets in $$s but in BBs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|