Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2007, 10:22 PM
Bulletproof Monk Bulletproof Monk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: THREE OH SIX AM
Posts: 3,893
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

[ QUOTE ]
Do you really guys think that villain will call this river with A hight?

[/ QUOTE ]

there is some % of the time he calls with A hi and there is some % of the time he folds A hi
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2007, 07:44 PM
JJack JJack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 518
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

[ QUOTE ]
*Grunch*

I would play all hand c/c.

River b/f I think is mistake cus if we assume villain's rage is:
TT+,AQs+,AQo+

then when we bet he will fold all we would win (AQos)
we only beat QQ with is 3 combination (we hold one Q) and JJ (6 combination)

If we are behind (most probably) we are behind of AKos (12+4), KK (3), AA(6), TT(3)

So we are ahead and we will probably call if we bet = 9
we are behind and we just lose 1 BB and risk being bluff = 28

So at river we are about 3:1 underdog

[/ QUOTE ]

If we are behind (most probably) we are behind of AKos (6+2), KK (1), AA(6), TT(3)

ok so when i improve my math will be:

(

So we are ahead and we will probably call if we bet = 9
we are behind and we just lose 1 BB and risk being bluff = 18

So at river we are about 2:1 underdog (If he dont call with air like A high)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2007, 06:02 PM
beyazkus beyazkus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ~Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi~
Posts: 35
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

* g *

ok, lets do some math... after he capped preflop we can put him on a narrow range of hands considering his pfr of 7.5%: QQ+ and AKs, AKo seem standard. but considering that he raised from the hijack and could conceive of your 3-bet as a defensive raise then it would be fair to assume that he would cap with JJ, AQs, AQo, and possibly AJs. so taking into consideration his whole range:
JJ - 6 ways
QQ - 3 ways (you have a Q)
KK - 2 ways (you have a K and one on board)
AA - 6 ways
AKs + AKo - 8 ways (you have a K and one on board)
AQs + AQo - 12 ways (you have a Q)
AJs - 4 ways

so on the flop there are 25 ways that you are ahead while 16 ways that you can be behind presumming our assumptions are correct. in this case a raise is mandatory as you are a favorite to be ahead, and as his response to your raise will help you determine where you are at. notice that being a favorite to be ahead doesn't make you a favorite to win the hand, as your op has considerably more outs if you are ahead, as opposed to your slim number of outs if you are behind. so the key aspect remains to raise to see where you are at.

if he 3-bets you on the flop then check / call turn, check / call river... if an ace or another spade hits on the river give a crying call...

if he doesn't 3-bet the flop, then by all means bet the turn too, if you get raised check / call river same as above.

if he doesn't 3-bet the flop, and calls your bet on the turn, then bet the river as long as a spade or ace doesn't hit. if they do hit (as in our example), then it is probably better to check and call, as you will get raised with a better hand if you bet and will have to call, and by checking you gain the possibility of inducing a bluff, or a bet with a worse hand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2007, 07:36 PM
JJack JJack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 518
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

*g*

ye
You make good math (I miss count something ;P)
But KK has 1 combo not 2.

With math I agree. But rest I dont.
You can be ahead but also behaind but if villain has AQ or AJ u want he c-bet also turn - cus he has then only A outs clean.
So when u ahead u wanna he put money at pot and when u behing he can fold those hand and only raise with better so u will pay more if u are behind and u will kick out 3 outer when ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2007, 10:55 AM
beyazkus beyazkus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ~Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi~
Posts: 35
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

[ QUOTE ]
But KK has 1 combo not 2.

[/ QUOTE ]

so true [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

with regard to the WA/WB line which seems to be supported by the more frequent posters (bennyhana, Fadook, Bulletproof Monk) i get the feeling that reading sshe for a third time might me due for me to remind myself of these scenarios...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2007, 01:31 PM
Smurph64 Smurph64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,574
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

I like check/raise on the turn myself but this works.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:15 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK of A
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: SB defense with KQs

You're behind

8 x AK
6 x AA
1 x AQs?
3 x TT?

18 combinations

and ahead of

3 x QQ
6 x JJ
3 x AQs?

12 combinations

So you got 40% equity on the end, a lot of people will raise AA on the end, some AK, AQ spades obviously, but you need a specific read to know if he will ever raise a hand you beat, I dunno I think I prefer a check call, but I suck.

Basically I think folding in a pot this size would be a mistake with TP against a solid player.

Regards Mack
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.