![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
To me this seems contradictory because of card removal. [/ QUOTE ] The probability that a given player of the two has a pair of queens is lower, but the probability that at least one of the two players has a pair of queens is higher. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On fifth street, there are 40 ways that the other guy can have trip Queens, but only six ways that he can have, say, pocket Aces. I think checking behind is reasonable.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I've seen people play their hand dark and call down the whole way in multiway pots when both players obviously had big hands in a live 75/150 game. People seem to find ways to play terrible no matter how much money is at stake. [/ QUOTE ] Do you ever worry that the money is just going to run out? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. bet 2. profit 3. repeat
he checked 5th => trip 4s good maybe ill change my mind if he raises my bet checking behind = weak tight scared andy, yes there are more combos of split Qs even with the dead Q, but his 3rd street play weights it more toward AA. yes, people are that predictable. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|