|
View Poll Results: Who is the worst team in the NFL? | |||
Tampa Bay | 0 | 0% | |
Arizona | 2 | 1.13% | |
Cleveland | 0 | 0% | |
Tennessee | 8 | 4.52% | |
Houston | 4 | 2.26% | |
Oakland | 146 | 82.49% | |
Detroit | 14 | 7.91% | |
Miami | 2 | 1.13% | |
Green Bay | 1 | 0.56% | |
Voters: 177. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: fast tables only
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand the problem between connection and fast cash game table if you have a network problem you are sitout until you come back ... [/ QUOTE ] there is no "all in protection" therefore if you have problems after the cards are dealt you will be check/folded. This is extremely irritating when you hold AA, there is some wild betting before u and then u time out and fold.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: fast tables only
[ QUOTE ]
in my highly scientifical observations on a busy night. these numbers are typical of an avg lineup of NL100 PS normal tables avg= 60 hands/hr PS Fast tables avg= 100 hands/hr FTP Tables avg= 75 hands/hr for some reason people take longer at NL200, so lower all numbers by about 12-15%. but there are more fast tables anyways at nl200. I would not move all tables to fast. I think the way its setup now is fast and efficient. If someone wants to only play fast tables then they have that option. [/ QUOTE ] that's totally wrong, your numbers for fast tables are way off. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: fast tables only
Have you ever noticed that the fast tables play significantly tighter than the regular ones? Getting rid of the "slow" tables is -EV.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|