#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this a hand that I should be raising?
fwiw, i raise this every time with 3 limpers, and probably sometimes with 2 limpers as well.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this a hand that I should be raising?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] With three limpers and none described as TP you’ve got around 20% if you include random hands in the blinds so the raise would be +EV. [/ QUOTE ] Humor me, I'm not very bright. Where did you get this number? [/ QUOTE ] I’m sure you’re brighter than me, but I used Pokerstove putting in limping hands for first three in the pot and random hands from the blinds. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this a hand that I should be raising?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] With three limpers and none described as TP you’ve got around 20% if you include random hands in the blinds so the raise would be +EV. [/ QUOTE ] Humor me, I'm not very bright. Where did you get this number? [/ QUOTE ] I’m sure you’re brighter than me, but I used Pokerstove putting in limping hands for first three in the pot and random hands from the blinds. [/ QUOTE ] I'm really quite too tired to explain why this is meaningless right now. Maybe I'll take a shot at it tomorrow morning. Dave (or anyone else), if you feel like beating me to it, knock yourself out. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this a hand that I should be raising?
Can someone explain where I went wrong? I’d like to learn how to better use Pokerstove in these situations or if it’s not applicable here.
Thanks |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this a hand that I should be raising?
[ QUOTE ]
I had seen several limp reraises by this point already [/ QUOTE ] what types of hands? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|