#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
[ QUOTE ]
if he is stronger than 2-pair, then he'll reraise or push if you raise and you'll probably have a hard time justifying a fold with top 2-pair. [/ QUOTE ] i'm pretty sure if i raise it will be smallish and will fold to a 3bet. so the small chance of being valuebluffed off the best hand does of course hurt the value of a raise, but i think the chance of that is extremely slim. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
[quoteIf it's a weak blocker, then he folds if you raise
[/ QUOTE ] my thoughts are that he snap calls a small raise with any aces up and most likely calls with any two pair. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
I would just call the river bet b/c I don't see a ton of value in a raise here. What is he calling the flop with? Maybe he limped with A6/A4s and will call a raise but he is folding or raising you all in with everything else.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
just call the river.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
I don;t play this limit but... there isn't much you lose to that checks a turn. Maybe pocket 66's. I think you've underrepped and should raise for value. No?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
Any idea if villian is good enough that he would c/r 444 or 66 on the river here? If he is then raise for value since thats probably the line he takes, if not then I think you have to call as worse than aces up will fold and better will always shove. If he's really bad then 53 just got there but I can't see that happening too often.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
[ QUOTE ]
what i quoted was poor logic because it wasn't logic at all. [/ QUOTE ] Now there's logic for you. The rest of you who didn't respond with X, Y, and, even better, Z, better look out. So was your "logic" to raise correct? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what i quoted was poor logic because it wasn't logic at all. [/ QUOTE ] Now there's logic for you. The rest of you who didn't respond with X, Y, and, even better, Z, better look out. So was your "logic" to raise correct? [/ QUOTE ] other people's responses were pretty decent. i was trying to help you and if you took my comment a little more seriously you may have become a better poker player, but whatever. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
RESULTS:
I called and he showed A6. At the time i was thinking 200 and fold to shove was the play, but i've value towned myself so much at 6max that i felt like maybe if my instinct was that it was close i should lean towards just calling at full ring. still not sure, definitely close. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AK for top two (NL600)
[ QUOTE ]
other people's responses were pretty decent. i was trying to help you and if you took my comment a little more seriously you may have become a better poker player, but whatever. [/ QUOTE ] LOL. And I thought you were just trying to help me be a better poster. Somehow I missed reading between the lines on how your comment could make me a better poker player. I agree with the call, though. Don't second guess yourself. Still wondering why you didn't bet the turn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|