Tuco_Ramirez PWNING Antonius on FT 1k/2k right now

[Fiasco]

I read something about this guy in NVG, Im pretty sure he isnt our Tuco (whose real name is Adam something I think)

[gergery]

I believe this is our Tuco, Adam from www.bigpoker.ca

Those were some interesting hands. I'm constantly amazed at how small the difference is between blufftardedness, thin valuebettedness, and crazy agressiveness required for HU play.

For perspective, from games I've railbirded, Luigi plays and raises 95% of his hands from SB, and gets to showdown with about 50% of all the hands he plays, making these games action-fests.

[J_V]

My guess is Tuco is a 20k-30k/hr dog. It might take Antonius a while to figure out how to handle him though.

[cero_z]

[ QUOTE ]
My guess is Tuco is a 20k-30k/hr dog. It might take Antonius a while to figure out how to handle him though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Totally agree. Antonius played very well IMO vs. a player who was just going off pot after pot, which made no sense once he'd established that he was capable of it. When I'm playing my worst, this is what I do.

[Tuco]

[ QUOTE ]
Please tell me this is Tuco from here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Guys,

It wasn't me making the decisions or taking the risk. After watching the hands and looking at some of the histories, I don't think I would be a dog to PA HU O8. Not bragging, because he would destroy me at every other dicipline of the game (except maybe short handed poo-flinging), but O8 isn't his best game. Of course, this is a bit like saying that I would be a better house painter than Michaelangelo, but you get the idea.

FWIW, I think alot of people who post here would be +EV against him. Gergery etc. Not sure, however, how long that will last with the poker brilliance the man showcases on a daily basis.

Tuco.

[gergery]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please tell me this is Tuco from here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Guys,

It wasn't me making the decisions or taking the risk. After watching the hands and looking at some of the histories, I don't think I would be a dog to PA HU O8. Not bragging, because he would destroy me at every other dicipline of the game (except maybe short handed poo-flinging), but O8 isn't his best game. Of course, this is a bit like saying that I would be a better house painter than Michaelangelo, but you get the idea.

FWIW, I think alot of people who post here would be +EV against him. Gergery etc. Not sure, however, how long that will last with the poker brilliance the man showcases on a daily basis.

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]

If thats' an offer to stake me, I accept, lol.

[Micturition Man]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please tell me this is Tuco from here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Guys,

It wasn't me making the decisions or taking the risk. After watching the hands and looking at some of the histories, I don't think I would be a dog to PA HU O8. Not bragging, because he would destroy me at every other dicipline of the game (except maybe short handed poo-flinging), but O8 isn't his best game. Of course, this is a bit like saying that I would be a better house painter than Michaelangelo, but you get the idea.

FWIW, I think alot of people who post here would be +EV against him. Gergery etc. Not sure, however, how long that will last with the poker brilliance the man showcases on a daily basis.

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]


I wonder if the variance in LO8 is higher than I appreciate, because both Chau and Patrik have really sick winrates in my DB, over large samples, and I always though both of them had obvious leaks in their games.

[Tuco]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please tell me this is Tuco from here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Guys,

It wasn't me making the decisions or taking the risk. After watching the hands and looking at some of the histories, I don't think I would be a dog to PA HU O8. Not bragging, because he would destroy me at every other dicipline of the game (except maybe short handed poo-flinging), but O8 isn't his best game. Of course, this is a bit like saying that I would be a better house painter than Michaelangelo, but you get the idea.

FWIW, I think alot of people who post here would be +EV against him. Gergery etc. Not sure, however, how long that will last with the poker brilliance the man showcases on a daily basis.

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]


I wonder if the variance in LO8 is higher than I appreciate, because both Chau and Patrik have really sick winrates in my DB, over large samples, and I always though both of them had obvious leaks in their games.

[/ QUOTE ]

How big is the sample size?

Tuco.

[Micturition Man]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please tell me this is Tuco from here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Guys,

It wasn't me making the decisions or taking the risk. After watching the hands and looking at some of the histories, I don't think I would be a dog to PA HU O8. Not bragging, because he would destroy me at every other dicipline of the game (except maybe short handed poo-flinging), but O8 isn't his best game. Of course, this is a bit like saying that I would be a better house painter than Michaelangelo, but you get the idea.

FWIW, I think alot of people who post here would be +EV against him. Gergery etc. Not sure, however, how long that will last with the poker brilliance the man showcases on a daily basis.

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]


I wonder if the variance in LO8 is higher than I appreciate, because both Chau and Patrik have really sick winrates in my DB, over large samples, and I always though both of them had obvious leaks in their games.

[/ QUOTE ]

How big is the sample size?

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have Patrik at 3.06 per 100 over 12,321 hands and Chau at 5.55 per 100 over 7,846 hands.

I guess I have to retract my comment, I had thought the samples were larger than that.

Although someone posted a screenshot with like 25k hands or something for Patrik with a really high winrate.

[J_V]

Patrik and Ciau aren't in the same league, IMO. Ciau has major leaks to plug. If Patrick has leaks, they aren't as major as Ciau. Patrik is a much more sophisticated player as well, IMO.