#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
[ QUOTE ]
All three so far were pretty bad. [/ QUOTE ] Make that four . . . |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
Agree 100% with Randy. That started terrible and then it got better. Still think this guy has a nice voice, probably one of the best males.
All four have made awful song choices so far. EDIT: I honestly hope Paul Kim 1) gets enough votes to come back and 2) wears shoes next week. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
Hey Paula, Ultimate Warrior called and he wants his hair back.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
Paul Kim wasn't disastrous. It wouldn't surprise me if he makes it past this week. Still better than Rudy.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
This is getting worse.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
Dear Yo_Respeck,
Your boy can't dance and his singing is weird. Elliot did that 50x better last year (with worse dancing). Jiggy |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
So far, provided Chris Sligh doesn't sound like crap, he will probably have a decent edge (for the guys). 2 of the top 5 guys (in terms of the market) have already sounded mediocre at best.
This may be a premature statement since we've only seen 5 guys. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
Nick Pedro: better than I expected.
EDIT: At his current price ($2), he might be a good short term buy. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
So far 6 performances ranging from ho-hum to awful. Nick's voice is weak and that song was boring but he was actually in tune. Brandon was probably best by a slim margin.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Boys Night Discussion 2.20.07***
What we've been seeing as a huge trend so far is bad song choice (boring, not memorable, etc.).
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|