|
View Poll Results: Who wins the 2006 Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year Award? | |||
Billy Donovan | 1 | 1.67% | |
Vince Young | 2 | 3.33% | |
Italy's WC Team | 1 | 1.67% | |
Bill Cowher | 0 | 0% | |
Roger Federer | 11 | 18.33% | |
Dwayne Wade | 5 | 8.33% | |
Tony La Russa | 1 | 1.67% | |
Paul Tagliabue | 2 | 3.33% | |
George Mason men's bb team | 4 | 6.67% | |
Tiger Woods | 28 | 46.67% | |
"Game of Shadows" writers | 3 | 5.00% | |
Other | 2 | 3.33% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
What happened to Daviaces? He came over from Doyle's Room the same time I did. I used to see him all the time but haven't seen him at all in a few weeks.
|
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
for fullTilters: I've heard on 2p2 some rumblings about a rewards program (in the near future?) similar to Stars fpp system for those of us without rakeback. Remember reading it on here sometime in the last month or so. Has anyone heard any news on this? It really sucks not getting either rakeback or fpp/vpp rewards. Thanks in advance if anyone has some info. [/ QUOTE ] I have heard nothing about this, and I've been keeping my ears open fairly intently for a while now. |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
Serious question, but why would anybody ever play on FT if they don't have rakeback, or are not clearing a bonus?
|
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
i have a feeling a lot of them that missed out on it around here have a second account that does have rakeback, and just want it fixed so they can go back to their old account and not have to mess with that.
if they don't, then i have no idea. cartoony avatars? |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
I guess that makes sense, I play there almost 100% of the time, but it's only because of rakeback seeing as their game selection isn't great, and their customer support is terrible.
|
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
...game selection isn't great,... [/ QUOTE ] it is at least comparable to stars for most times of day. for instance, right now there are 45 ftp 1/2 tables and ~40 stars tables. not sure for higher/lower limits though |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
game selection can mean how tough the games are. Most people think the FTP games are tougher than stars. Part of the reason is that 2/3 of cardrunners members play there.
Also, im sure that really really good players love being able to express whether they are normal, happy, sad, or confused. |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
game selection can mean how tough the games are. Most people think the FTP games are tougher than stars. Part of the reason is that 2/3 of cardrunners members play there. Also, im sure that really really good players love being able to express whether they are normal, happy, sad, or confused. [/ QUOTE ] true. i'd be interested in seeing a comparison of average pot, players/flop for stars and ftp. here are the numbers for ftp >100k hands at 1/2: avg pot = $28.08 avg saw flop = 24.30% anyone wanna chime in with stars numbers? |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
How big is the change from 100NL to 200NL on FTP?
|
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
How big is the change from 100NL to 200NL on FTP? [/ QUOTE ] Not too big. There's a few more mulititabling semi-nits, so the games are a bit tougher. But it's not uncommon for me to see some of the fish on my buddy list playing both 100 and 200 (I usually play 100). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|