Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:12 PM
SellingtheDrama SellingtheDrama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 712
Default Re: Playing Limit

I like that line, its pretty standard - especially if you feel you can get substantial river action (which you did). The other factor is that you have better odds than a naked flush draw - gutshot straight draw helps.

When you see the turn, you are 23.8% against the hands of set deuces/AJ. The first call is automatic (vs a fold), and once it is 3 bets back to you, you know its a 3 way capped pot if you call - so its 3BB to win 15.2 in the pot. That's an acceptable price.

And when we're talking about limit play (this is also true in PLO often, but I digress), it's entirely common to have both players playing a hand correctly when it goes bet-call. Player A is ahead so he is right to bet. Player B is mathematically getting the proper immediate odds to call, so he does. Perfectly normal, happens almost every hand, especially if the pot gets bloated early.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:22 PM
JH1 JH1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Blogging
Posts: 367
Default Re: Playing Limit

Kurn, umm I don't have a pair on the river, I have the nuts.

Selling, thanks for the advice. Your last paragraph is what I'm really struggling with in my head though. I just can't wrap my mind around both players playing correctly because it seems like the only thing that separates the winning players from the losing players then is variance which in the long term is supposed to even out, therefore that makes everyone who can count odds and outs a winner which is probably more than half the poker playing community, which makes this impossible. Sorry this is just weird poker theory stuff I'm making up.

Anyways, in the hand above UTG had J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] for 2 pair and UTG+2 had Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] for the turned straight. We all played this hand correctly except for UTG on the river I suppose. I'll have to think about this some more, weird.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:29 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: Playing Limit

[ QUOTE ]
Kurn, umm I don't have a pair on the river, I have the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's talking about the first hand, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:55 PM
SellingtheDrama SellingtheDrama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 712
Default Re: Playing Limit

[ QUOTE ]
Kurn, umm I don't have a pair on the river, I have the nuts.

Selling, thanks for the advice. Your last paragraph is what I'm really struggling with in my head though. I just can't wrap my mind around both players playing correctly because it seems like the only thing that separates the winning players from the losing players then is variance which in the long term is supposed to even out, therefore that makes everyone who can count odds and outs a winner which is probably more than half the poker playing community, which makes this impossible. Sorry this is just weird poker theory stuff I'm making up.

Anyways, in the hand above UTG had J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] for 2 pair and UTG+2 had Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] for the turned straight. We all played this hand correctly except for UTG on the river I suppose. I'll have to think about this some more, weird.

[/ QUOTE ]

Many poker players think they understand concepts but apply them horribly. And you are absolutely correct that variance can be a huge part of limit games, and you now know why. I don't frequent the limit forums, but this is the crux of why winrates are so thin relative to big bet games.

And yeah I've struggled with the same concepts too - I basically don't ever play LHE for a reason.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2007, 05:11 PM
Dalek Dalek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 157
Default Re: Playing Limit

I think he means in a specific hand both players can play correctly. Over the course of thousands of hands it becomes clearer that one player plays better.

I would raise pre-flop with AQ suited but my experience with limit is small. Is this an alright play or should i just call with AQ type hands?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2007, 05:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Playing Limit

Definitely raise preflop with AQs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2007, 05:46 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
Posts: 9,146
Default Re: Playing Limit

Uh, How is QQ the nuts on a JT542 board?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2007, 06:20 PM
JH1 JH1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Blogging
Posts: 367
Default Re: Playing Limit

[ QUOTE ]
Uh, How is QQ the nuts on a JT542 board?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry thought you were talking about the second hand I posted where I rivered a flush.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:32 AM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
Posts: 9,146
Default Re: Playing Limit

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Uh, How is QQ the nuts on a JT542 board?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry thought you were talking about the second hand I posted where I rivered a flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

I realized that after I posted this. Sorry for the confusion.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2007, 03:31 PM
MattHH MattHH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: Playing Limit

[ QUOTE ]
You make money in limit when you realize that your made hand or draw is not the best and fold, saving bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are many ways to save bets in limit, but they are not limited to folding.

[ QUOTE ]
It just didn't make sense to me before how you could have winning players because if there multiple players in pots all getting 5:1 a lot of the time or better, they are almost always all correct to call, therefore no one is making mistakes and therefore everyone should be a winner which does not compute.

[/ QUOTE ]

A lot of times, people are not getting the correct odds to call and they call anyways, donating money to everybody else. Also, you have to think about making their odds worse by raising/ check-raising to make opponents get worse odds (in the appropriate situations).

If you haven't read ToP yet, I highly recommend it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.