***Official*** CNN/YouTube GOP debate

[Taso]

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]


lol, agreed.


Paul should have been allowed to respond to Tancredo, by the way.

[soilworker_24]

WTF does RG's response have to do with the question????

[jstnrgrs]

I remember they used to have debates in which the audience had to agree to remain silent. I wish they would do that again. the live audience really diminishes the quality of the debate.

[Scary_Tiger]

count: 10, i think like 8 were Rudy.

[Kedu]

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]

You're obsessed.

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

[Cumulonimbus]

[ QUOTE ]
"the, the, the, the...people in the north"

well played sir

[/ QUOTE ]

ah c'mon, he's oooold

[Case Closed]

[ QUOTE ]

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.

[JackWhite]

[ QUOTE ]
man i hate the MSM. how hard would it be to take a few corporate MSM buildings down, Fight Club style?

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting question....sir

[Taso]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

This has been a bad debate for Paul though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.

[/ QUOTE ]


Disagreed.

[EvilSteve]

[ QUOTE ]
I remember they used to have debates in which the audience had to agree to remain silent. I wish they would do that again. the live audience really diminishes the quality of the debate.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it would make the debates less emotionally driven and you'd have a better discussion of the actual issues. Unfortunately most people wouldn't find it as entertaining to watch, which would hurt ratings. CNN did what was right for CNN.