|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
crai is very standard.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
[ QUOTE ]
crai is very standard. [/ QUOTE ] agreed, u have 50bb. I dont' beleive in making reads with 50bb when u have an overpair. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
Ok, let me try to explain a general thought process about bad live players.
On 2+2, we're very used to the idea of thinking about a hand in multiple ways. I.e, villain could call flop partially for showdown value, partially to take pot away if I check the turn. However, I haven't seen evidence that most bad players think this way. Usually, people think about a hand in only one way. If they have a strong hand, they play it for value. If they have a gutshot, they may call a big raise to spike their card, but are far less likely to call the flop as a float with the intention of betting the turn when checked to. In this case, I think that if villain is playing a small pair, he is in calldown mode, and consequently highly unlikely to bet the turn (thereby increasing the size of a pot he was only aiming to calldown in in the first place). Also keep in mind that I said I have not yet seen villain out of line when raising postflop. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
I know this is early for a bump, but I'm very curious about what people think of the above analysis.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
raise more pf, bet until all ur chips are in the middle
zzz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
Ugh, I can't stand the 2+2 mentality of not being permitted to think when you have less than 100bb.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Couple spots vs same LAG, 5/10 NL live
Bump one last time for opinions re: my general analysis of bad live players.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|