|
View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
Yes | 7 | 16.28% | |
No | 14 | 32.56% | |
No, but my significant other does | 0 | 0% | |
No, but I'd consider it | 4 | 9.30% | |
Tanning is gay, dude | 18 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
- Keep Antes
- Lower rake on $3 10-man SNG to $0.30 imo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
* I don't care if there are antes or not, really
* the jump from BB200 to BB400 is probably too brutal and the one from BB200 to BB200+ante probably too soft. * the 32+3 (I think) SnG level is a joke and nobody plays on it. Something like 37-40 + 3 would be much better * I think having 10 players / table would be better than 9 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Keep the antes. I think you should make all the SNGs 10 man, because it will increase the regulars' win rate, which will make them play more.
If you want to stop the stalling at the high stakes, just stop PokerinPb from using whatever program he is using and everything will be fine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work. [/ QUOTE ] The main reason I think people want the Party structure is because it effectively ends stalling. At least this is my reason. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
- Keep The Ante
- More Sng turbo 6 players |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
If you want to stop the stalling at the high stakes, just stop PokerinPb from using whatever program he is using and everything will be fine. [/ QUOTE ] There are quite a few people stalling lately who are not named poker_in_pb. I prefer not to name names but I will say that something really needs to be done about it. It is getting to the point where people anticipate 4 hands ahead of time how much they need to stall so the blind will go up when it's their button. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Love the idea of using Party's hands per level structure instead of minutes per level. The stalling has gotten much worse lately.
Please please please do not get rid of antes. I personally like the idea of changing the 100/200/25 to 150/300/25 but it wouldn't be that big a deal really if no one stalled. Also I prefer the 10 mans to the 9 mans but really I don't care that much either way. And yeah like everyone else said the rake is ridiculous. Your volume in 500s & up must be about 10% of what it was 8 months ago. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
lower the rake for sng regs' sake plz. the 32+3 turbo is a joke. I would like to see a good lvl between 25+2 and 55+5 turbo. and change 25+2 to 28+2, 55+5 to 56+4 or stuff like that. The rake has been too high for us to beat the game. lower the rake and find a good lvl between those 2 would be a good idea.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|