Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2007, 11:34 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Why are value investor types so rigidly opposed to TA?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why are those types so ready to dismiss TA as worthless?

[/ QUOTE ]

because they are poor value investors and have a strong need to validate themselves.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither of this applies to Buffett or dozens of value managers with multi-decade records of beating the market. These guys don't use TA, and don't need any more validation. Whether TA works or not, they'll tell you they never needed it.

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't consider buffett et al "those types" - and (correct me if i'm wrong) i don't think buffett would claim that TA is worthless to everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

How come there are value investors in the Forbes 400 but no TA types?

[/ QUOTE ]

John Arnold for one. Youngest on the Forbes list, was a trader for Enron and now has his own hedge fund.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2007, 02:21 AM
DesertCat DesertCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pwned by A-Rod
Posts: 4,236
Default Re: Why are value investor types so rigidly opposed to TA?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


How come there are value investors in the Forbes 400 but no TA types?

[/ QUOTE ]

John Arnold for one. Youngest on the Forbes list, was a trader for Enron and now has his own hedge fund.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's in commodities, which is different than stocks because commodities don't really have intrinsic values, so traditional FA isn't possible. But just because he's called a trader doesn't mean he uses TA.

[ QUOTE ]
Arnold said he looks to place bets when he thinks a market has become "biased," moving prices away from what he considers fair value, according to a February report about the annual meeting by Platts Power Markets Week.

marketwatch article


[/ QUOTE ]

He places bets when price is different from value, that's more FA like than TA. He takes on contracts based on risk analysis, using a full time meteorologist on staff to help, that's FA. At Enron, he made almost risk free money as a market maker, i.e. arbitrage, i.e. FA.

And remember, Brian Hunter at Amaranth was also a top trader and headed for billionaire status until he blew Amaranth up. Whatever his techniques, Arnold needs to stand the test of time before we can crown him.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.