|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?
I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100. THANKS. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean? I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100. THANKS. [/ QUOTE ] That makes sense. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean? I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100. THANKS. [/ QUOTE ] so it's 10.75 ptbb/100? this is not that crazy, especially over only 25k hands. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
I'm not asking wheter or not this is my tru winrate. I understand that this type of winrate can't be sustainable over a larger sample size.
I was just trying to see what can be safely assumed from the results so far. If a player is at 21.5 bb/100 over 25K, can it ALL be based on a CRAZY good run of cards? That seems unlikely as well, right? I was just trying to see what people here felt this type of stat meant for future expectations (if anything can be gathered from it, really). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
[ QUOTE ]
I was just trying to see what can be safely assumed from the results so far. If a player is at 21.5 bb/100 over 25K, can it ALL be based on a CRAZY good run of cards? That seems unlikely as well, right? [/ QUOTE ] You are most likely a losing player. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
10.5 pt/bb is sustainable for the best players at 1/2 but they always move up and dont stay there. Im pretty sure I know a lot of guys who could do it 6 tabling over 100k hands. Doesnt mean OP's winrate is sustainable, but its possible
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
[ QUOTE ]
10.5 pt/bb is sustainable for the best players at 1/2 but they always move up and dont stay there. Im pretty sure I know a lot of guys who could do it 6 tabling over 100k hands. Doesnt mean OP's winrate is sustainable, but its possible [/ QUOTE ] prop bet? I know this would never go down unless I got more people to put up money with me, but I would bet 10k (maybe less if you got a real superstar, but no less than 2k) that pretty much noone has a 10PTBB expectation at 1/2 at stars or FT 6 max. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 10.5 pt/bb is sustainable for the best players at 1/2 but they always move up and dont stay there. Im pretty sure I know a lot of guys who could do it 6 tabling over 100k hands. Doesnt mean OP's winrate is sustainable, but its possible [/ QUOTE ] prop bet? I know this would never go down unless I got more people to put up money with me, but I would bet 10k (maybe less if you got a real superstar, but no less than 2k) that pretty much noone has a 10PTBB expectation at 1/2 at stars or FT 6 max. [/ QUOTE ] over how many hands? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
Okay, I give up on this thread...lol. I can why it looks like I was just trying to brag, but that wasn't my intention. I was really curious as to what these results so far might transate into future expectations.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?
I played 1 or two tables at the most. The swings were crazy so I wanted to try switching to full ring games and multitable anywhere from usually 4-6 at a time. The swings are less and the winrate at each table has drastically dropped, but the overall profit seems similar (slightly less actually). I was assuming the 21.5 bb/100 is out of the question to sustain so I should stick with multitabling full ring games. It seems I got my answer, thanks.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|