|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
The DOJ aszwipe has tried to divert the discussion to sexual predators online, and the Calopy guy has fallen for it. Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
ok, TY guys, i am trying to listen online! Think positive thoughts
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology. [/ QUOTE ] She wisely moved off it, at least. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology. [/ QUOTE ] She wisely moved off it, at least. [/ QUOTE ] She was much better in the Q&A..Loved the re-directs to the DOJ only wished they would've/could've pressed her more specically on the Wire Act.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
Just tuned in. Is it over or are they resuming?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
They're in recess because of votes they need to do.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
Very basic question...What are they voting on????
And where did Rep Berkley go???? She was great but must've left after her testimony..Would've loved to hear her reply to the DOJ and the FoF guy... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology. [/ QUOTE ] She wisely moved off it, at least. [/ QUOTE ] She was much better in the Q&A..Loved the re-directs to the DOJ only wished they would've/could've pressed her more specically on the Wire Act.. [/ QUOTE ] I think Conyers indicated that he will do just that after the recess. I look forward to hearing more about the horse racing exemption/non-exemption (i.e., we, the DOJ, say we think it's illegal, but we've done nothing about for 30 years). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
Can we sneak pokers UIGEA exemptino into a version of the war funding bill that won't get vetoed.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
I have to leave, can someone post a link to the audio after it finishes, please!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|