#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
on an aside, you can make ~$60/hr 24 tabling 200NL 6max from FPPs alone (1.5 ptbb/100 if you're SuperNova)
to the OP: just overlap? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why would someone want to play 24 tables? [/ QUOTE ] FGators mentality. FPPs are more important than playing winning poker. [/ QUOTE ] This goes along way to explaining why Stars is such a huge nit-magnet. Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
if you are willing to code, you code do something like mth with ahk.
active table centered, than next to act tables around this and non active tables out of screen. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
[ QUOTE ]
find this guy and ask him maybe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfTAgkwxgko [/ QUOTE ] hmm, I can play 100+ play money tables without any problem [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] I think with bet-pot script you can easily play more than 1000 tables without much hassle ... at least for the few seconds that the video shows... If I had money for that I could also play 100+ real money tables but in case I ever want to burn my money I have a cigar lighter... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
dont play 24 tables at once, play 12 first, then the other 12.
ldo |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How could you possibly want to 24 table and not have the money to at least have a 1600x1200 monitor if not 2 or 3. [/ QUOTE ] The question is obviously someone being silly. I mean, if you're able to play 24 tables, and your screen isn't big enough...duhhhh. IMHO, if you aren't making a profit and have to ask what do, play less tables. play bigger stakes if you are a winning player and buy a bigger monitor. Why would someone want to play 24 tables? There is NO way to concentrate on that many tables. I read an excellent article that showed the loss/gain with 4 vs 8 vs 12 vs 16, which is as high as they felt was even sane. The dropoff from 8 to 12 was enormous, and 16 was even worse. Bottom line was 8 was the ideal count, for those able to multi-table that high even. [/ QUOTE ] Link to the article? Truth be told I find it very VERY easy to concentrate at > 8 tables, up to about 12 tables. After that I kinda start losing my ability to focus. Of course I am rocky to TAGish so my decisions are quite a bit easier, but still, I can't imagine there would be a big loss on average moving from 8 to 12 tables. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
Why would they allow 24 tables, wouldn't the 'helping bots proliferate factor' outweigh them catering to a few superhumans that can actually play that number of tables?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
[ QUOTE ]
Why would they allow 24 tables... [/ QUOTE ] ... because of 2+2ers crying "Stars: FTP increased table limit - we want it also" (not an out-dated thread in the "Internet Gambling" forum). |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
cascade
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strategies for 24-tabling with a crappy 1280 x 1024 monitor? (Star
My house mate 30 tabled SNGs on a 19" (1280x1024) till he got his 30"
Cascade Tables is your friend |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|