![]() |
|
View Poll Results: What to do? | |||
Take a picture, Write a letter see if company offers me $$ |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 75.00% |
Do nothing. Worms are protein. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 6.82% |
Standard. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 18.18% |
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
One thing I find interesting about this thread. Despite the fact that many appear to believe that science has shed greater light on this question (than we was known in the 1600s), I haven't seen any arguments based on modern empirical science in this thread that tend to disprove the existence of God. Instead, interestingly, DS cited two facts of modern science (the photon/slit experiment) and our lack of ability to produce computers with conciousness) as evidence that God may exist. [/ QUOTE ] Science says nothing about God. Period. I think David is a sloppy thinker in this regard. He believes in a "God of the gaps." When something is unexplained, he considers God to be a rational explanation. That's why the double slit experiment is relevant to him, and why he thinks the justification for believing in God was greater in the past. But whether or not a phenomenon has been explained has no bearing on the question of God. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I think David is a sloppy thinker in this regard. He believes in a "God of the gaps." When something is unexplained, he considers God to be a rational explanation. That's why the double slit experiment is relevant to him, and why he thinks the justification for believing in God was greater in the past."
I may have never spelled it out because I thought it was self evident. But you are totally wrong when you say that I think that God is a rational explanation for unexplained events. It is only very specific unexplained stuff that relates to the things that God is supposed to care about, that makes me wonder. The fact that we can't explain why the speed of light is a certain number of proton widths per second is also unexplained, as far as I know. Do you think I think that is evidence for God? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do the results of the double-slit experiment represent any greater evidence of God than the values of the universal constants? If religious people had special healing powers, or if prayers had measurable effects, or if very specific religious prophecies came true, it would be another story.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The fact that we can't explain why the speed of light is a certain number of proton widths per second is also unexplained... [/ QUOTE ] Oh, really? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|